www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Nikon 35mm f/1.4G AF-S
9.6 out of 10

Nikon 35mm f/1.4G AF-S

Great Deal: $1,549.00

Reviews and Problems with Nikon 35mm f/1.4G AF-S

Showing 1-10 of 20

Nikon 35mm f/1.4 G AF-S

Ken Rockwell
4 weeks ago
  • Conclusion: Buy this lens only for 35mm film or FX. This 35mm f/1.4 G AF-S is a very expensive professional FX and 35mm film lens. It costs ten times as much as the 35mm f/1.8 DX , which does exactly the same thing on DX.
  • Cons: I'd be very careful not to cross-thread the plastic filter thread.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
9.5

Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.4G Review

What Digital Camera
7 August 2012
  • Summary: In short, this is a highly corrected lens that is likely to satisfy even the most discerning users. Nikon users whose pockets are less deep can choose between the 35mm f/1.8 DX lens, for around £160, and the 35mm f/2 D version for about £260.
  • Pros: Design build and performance
  • Cons: The high price
  • Read full review

Lens Test: Nikon 35mm f/1.4G ED

Pop Photo
7 August 2011
  • Excerpt: Last month we tested the industry’s least expensive 35mm f/1.4 lens (the $500 Rokinon 35mm AS UMC). This month, we shift to the opposite end of the pricing spectrum to one of the most expensive: Nikon’s $1,800 full-frame 35mm f/1.4G lens.
  • Read full review

REVIEW: Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm f/1.4G Lens Review

photodo
20 June 2011
  • Excerpt: Handling and features This wide angle lens from Nikon costs around £1300 and sports a bright f/1.4 maximum aperture, silent internal focusing and nano-crystal coatings to help control ghosting and flare.
  • Read full review

Nikkor AF-S 35mm f/1.4G

Camera Labs
1 March 2011
  • Excerpt: The Nikkor AF-S 35mm f/1.4G was announced September 2010 as the last prime to complete the updated series of 24mm, 50mm, and 85mm f/1.4 models in Nikon's line-up.
  • Read full review

Nikon 35mm f/1.4G AF-S Lens

The Digital Picture
12 October 2010
  • Excerpt: Is the Nikon 35mm f/1.4G AF-S Nikkor Lens right for you? Learn all you need to know about the Nikon 35mm f/1.4G AF-S Lens in The-Digital-Picture.com's review!
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm f/1.4G Lens Review

ePHOTOzine
15 January 2013
  • Excerpt: This wide angle lens from Nikon costs around £1300 and sports a bright f/1.4 maximum aperture, silent internal focusing and nano-crystal coatings to help control ghosting and flare.
  • Pros: Very sharp in the centre of the frame, Silent focusing, Low distortion, Very low CA, Highly resistant to flare, Durable weather-sealed magnesium construction
  • Cons: Falloff of illumination towards the corners at wide apertures, Sharpness towards the edges of the frame falls behind the performance in the centre of the frame
  • Read full review
Overall 7
7.3
Value for money 6
6.0
Overall quality 6
6.0
Build quality 10
10

Nikkor AF-S 35mm f/1.4 G (DX) - Review / Lab Test Report

photozone.de
26 August 2012
  • Conclusion: The Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.4 G is able to deliver impressive results on our DX test camera, however it is not without flaws. The image center is very sharp right from the largest aperture, but the borders and corners are quite soft wide open.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
7.7
Value for money 6
6.0
Overall quality 7
7.0
Build quality 10
10

Nikkor AF-S 35mm f/1.4 G (FX) - Review / Test Report

photozone.de
30 May 2012
  • Conclusion: It took Nikon a while to get into gear regarding their fast primes, but at least in case of the AF-S 35/1.4 G the result is impressive and was worth the wait. The image center is very sharp right from the largest aperture, the borders and corners follow only slightly behind and offer very good...
  • Read full review

AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G

LensTip.com
10 February 2011
  • Excerpt: Until recently one of the most serious charges against the Nikon system was that it lacked fast “prime” lenses with medium focal lengths and a modern focusing mechanism. The last launches made this accusation out of date – in recent years we’ve seen such lenses as the AF-S 50 mm f/1.4G, the AF-S 24...
  • Cons: not useful maximum relative aperture,, high chromatic aberration,, huge vignetting on full frame,, significant coma,, noticeable astigmatism,, weak price/quality ratio.
  • Read full review
Next page >>