Reviews and Problems with Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF VR AF-S
Showing 1-10 of 198
Don't leave for a photoshoot without it!
9 October 2014
Summary: I LOVE THIS LENS! My photos are crisp and the technical quality of them is second-to-nine. I do not leave for a shoot without this lens as it is my workhorse lens (in addition to my Nikon 50mm f/1.4G prime lens).
Summary: From a Nikon D70 to a D90 to a full frame D3 with a fast lens. I bit the bullet and invested in a Nikon D3 and a Nikon 70 - 200mm f/2 AF -S VR lens. Finally got what I wanted and not a bit sorry.
Summary: Just take the word of those who have written extensive positive reviews about this lens. They are all right. It's fast, not as heavy as others make it sound. It's lighter than the VRll version and provides the same IQ.
Summary: I've had this lens for several years, and yes I wish it were smaller and lighter. But recently I compared the results i get with it to my other top Nikon lenses (the 85 mm 1.4, the 14-24 2.8 zoom, etc).
Summary: Almost every full-time pro photographer who uses Nikon will own one of these lenses. Really, it is one of a couple of standards that pro's cannot live without. The 17-35 f/2.8 is the other, and many will carry the 24-70 lens f/2.8 as well.
Summary: Purchased this lens just two weeks ago. Right after purchase, i scheduled two photoshoots...as i was eager to test this lens capabilities. The weight is somewhat heavy, but compared to the Tamron 70-200 VC lens, and the Sigma..its about on par and lighter than the Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 D lens.
Fantastic lens, worth the money! You will not be disappointed.
8 June 2013
Summary: If you are here looking at reviews, you are probably looking for a good zoom lens, probably debating if you need the constant aperture of 2.8 or not, or if this Nikon lens is worth the money as it is fairly the same price of competing 3rd party lenses in its class.