Reviews and Problems with Nikon 24mm f/3.5D ED PC-E NIKKOR
Showing 1-10 of 67
This is the one!
D. KIMBALL, Amazon
21 May 2014
Summary: After purchasing all the top zoom lenses (14-24,24-70, and even a Nikon Edge85 for 2600mm of glory) I quickly realized the importance of glass in the elements as many do. Moving to a 35mm prime and a 85mm prime (1.4) I figured I had everything I needed for solid professional images. Occasionally pulling out the 14-24 for that super wide yet large focal plane - it works great for tight conditions and shooting the stars. Then I met the 24-pce.
Summary: Love this lens. Great clarity. I noted the advice about hitting the camera with it. I have so far not had a problem with that, but have had it slip when turned horizontally on my bracket. I'm careful not to tighten the screws too tight, don't want to strip them, but as a result, I have to watch it when turning the camera horizontally on the bracket. The clarity of the photos is so much better than my old lens, no comparison, and it's nice to be able to vary the f stops.
Summary: If you have a good copy of the 24 PC-E it sings on the D800. My copy is good. I wish Nikon would update their PC-E glass to the new Canon standards (the incredible 17 and new 24). This lens really does well with the D4 or D3x. Don't stop down below F/8 on a D800, otherwise you will get diffraction.
INDISPENSABLE LENS FOR LANDSCAPE & ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHERS
Artist in His Studio, Amazon
18 December 2013
Summary: Most I wanted to say here are already expressed. Maybe I can add. The lens is complex, very expensive, and Is It Worth It? The answer is absolutely 'YES'. The negative aspect is that it is hard and almost impossible to get clarity and razor-sharp images without a tripod. Because of that it makes the lens less versatile--as far as amount of supported-equipment needed to shoot scenes properly is concern. I wish the lens was both Manual and Auto Focus.
Summary: First off, this lens is just great as a straight 24mm lens. The color, contrast, sharpness, and especially the lack of any distortion is really amazing. I own 2 other Nikon pro lenses in the focal length range, the 14-24 f/2.8 and the 24-70 f/2.8, and this lens is visibly better than either of them. Particularly in the lack of distortion, I'm astounded how lines in skyscrapers are perfectly straight even to the edges of the frame.
Useful for specific purposes, but marred by distortion
John Grover, Amazon
3 May 2013
Summary: I bought this lens specifically for architecture project shoots. The lens performs well in that it is fast to use compared to the old 4x5 setup--you simply rotate the knob and the lens goes through the rise and fall range. Sharpness and quality are perfect in the center of the image but there is distinct barrel distortion (the buildings appear to bulge outward, or horizontal lines rise to the middle and fall to the outer edges).
Summary: The first thing that came in my mind when I first tried this wide angle tilt and shift after buying it: "why didn't I buy this lens before???" I always thought that these lenses were more appropriate in architectural photography, but they can do much more than that. For landscape, it is the perfect lens. First, its performances without using the tilt and shift are staggering. The sharpness and contrast are very impressive.
Excerpt: It's been only a few months, but this lens had already become my favorite wide-angle for landscapes and cityscapes in tandem with my D3. The perspective control is allowing me to do things I was not able to previously, not only correcting perspective, but also being able to shoot near-far compositions with good dof at moderate apertures.