www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S
8.3 out of 10

Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S

This AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED lens is an ultra-wide Read more

Great Deal: $25.44

Reviews and Problems with Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 2
2.0

Hey, I found this one from junkyard for $1.

K. Yi, Amazon
14 March 2014
  • Summary: and the owner said, it's NeCon, probably translated to English as the con artists from Japan, and probably will not work with older Nikon models, but with a plenty of lubrication with oil pumping D6x0 camera, it may work. Why did human invented the word, "caveat emptor?
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

KEH Camera sold me a broken lense. The autofocus motor was broken

Vivian Garcia Bonello, Amazon
8 January 2014
Overall 2
2.0

Extremely Disappointed

none, B&H Photo
29 September 2012
  • Excerpt: I am an advanced hobbyist so I do not actively look to photography as a source of income. However, I am serious about getting professional looking results. I started with a Nikon F50, to an F100, to a D200 (six years ago).
  • Pros: Easily Interchangeable, It Feels Like Quality, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Heavy, No Better Than My 500 Le
  • Read full review
Overall 1
1.0

User Review

Belladorna, Fredmiranda
29 May 2006
  • Conclusion: I don't understand why people are so lyrical about; it's just NOT sharp on a dSLR. Probably the sharpest zoom on a SLR, but if you only shoot digital: do not buy this. The focus is right-on tho, but 9 out of 10 times I will end up with an unsharp image; and I'll have to do a lot of post-processing...
  • Pros: Excellent build quality
  • Cons: Not suitable for digital
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Nikon 17-35/2,8

"koegler-heroldsberg", Amazon
10 July 2004
  • Summary: ich glaube, Nikon hat die Entwicklung verschlafen: Das so hoch gelobte 17-35 / 2,8 ist nicht ein besonderes weichzeichnendes Objektiv sondern meiner Meinung nach ein besonders unscharf zeichnendes Objektiv. Es ist seinen Preis von rund 2000 Euro nicht wert.
  • Read full review Translate to English