www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Kenko 3x Pro 300 DG Teleconverter
6.9 out of 10

Kenko 3x Pro 300 DG Teleconverter

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Kenko 3x Pro 300 DG Teleconverter

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 4
4.0
Value for money 4
4.0

User Review

Photography Review
10 April 2007
  • Summary: I have used this teleconverter with a nikon 180/2.8 ED and a Tamron 90 mm/2.8 macro. Both lenses are well known for their extreme sharpness and good contrast. With the 180 mm on a digital DX-size sensor you obtain 180 x 1.5 x 3 = 840 mm of focal lenght.
  • Pros: You will get that distant bird or rabbit full frame, just not sharp, autofocus did still work on my D200, though slow and not always 100% accurate
  • Cons: very visible loss of contrast with good lenses, very visible loss of sharpness. With 10 megapixels an enlargement and a 2 x teleconverter will probably give a better end result.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Value for money 10
10

User Review

thobe, Photography Review
10 September 2004
  • Summary: This review is based on the use of Nikon F80/N80 and Nikon 2.8/300 AF lens, using Fuji slide film and a tripod. According to the encouraging results of the shorter Kenko converters with this particular setup, I went lunatic and procured the 3x converter to get up to 900mm effective focal length.
  • Pros: Identical good build quality like other Kenko Pro300 converters., No observable vignetting., No change to coulour rendition., Fits well and works with Nikon mechanical AF lenses., Reasonable sharpness.
  • Cons: Visible reducion of contrast., Requires careful exposure metering, as it appears to over-expose slightly., Not good enough for people addicted to top quality.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Value for money 10
10

User Review

Photography Review
10 September 2004
Overall 8
8.0
Value for money 8
8.0

User Review

Photography Review
10 October 2003
  • Summary: Let me start by answering the question anybody who's considering purchasing this 3x TC is asking himself/herself: yes, it is for real and it *does* work. Optical quality is very good, expect the same results as a good third-party 2x TC, BUT (here's the usual big but when anything seems too good to...
  • Pros: - 3x, - Good/solid construction, - Good glass/optical quality, - Affordable price (around $200 on Ebay from several vendors.)
  • Cons: - Loss of 3 f-stops, - Autofocus useless on lenses with max aperture smaller than f/2.8, - Extremely sensitive to vibrations (tripod, fast film and stopped mirror obligatory to get decent results.)
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Value for money 8
8.0

User Review

Photography Review
10 October 2003