www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
8.5 out of 10

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM provides ultra wide-angle cover Read more

Great Deal: $549.00

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Showing 1-10 of 13
Overall 4
4.0

NOT ACCEED MY EXPECTATION

SSHMUS, B&H Photo
22 May 2014
  • Excerpt: MY SAMPLE WAS VERY SOFT ON 10MM AND A LITTLE SHARPE ON 22MM
  • Cons: Blurry Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Sucks

KOFFI AYI, Amazon
10 December 2013
  • Summary: they company i used sent me a used lense when i payed for a new on.. since i needed it for a shoot the next day i had to use it, but i was hosed!!!!!
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Not happy

heather, B&H Photo
16 May 2012
  • Excerpt: I had this lens for a while now approx 2 years. The focus is very slow and sometimes it is blurry on a subject. I switch to manual to get exactly the focus I want. Which isn't that great because if the subject doesn't want to stand still, it is useless.
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Poor in Low Light, Slow Focus, Weak Casing
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Disappointed in terms of sharpness

Jack the shutterbug, B&H Photo
25 May 2010
  • Excerpt: I like the extreme wide angle and find it very useful in some of my work. However, I am very disappointed in the sharpness of this lens. There is a big difference when compared to by 18-200 USM IS zoom. I was particularly surprised because many reviews praised the lens' sharpness.
  • Pros: Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Lightweight
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Well......

LightSeeker1, Adorama
8 October 2009
  • Excerpt: You know, I REALLY wanted to love this lens. I didn't.The image quality was fine ... I just didn't care for the super wide angle.After almost 200 images I realized that it wasn't giving me what I wanted in my wide angle photography - a sense of being 'there'.
  • Pros: Easily Interchangeable, Quick Focus, Sharp Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0
Value for money 2
2.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 4
4.0
Overall quality 2
2.0

Not Sharp

Canon Shooter, Canon
2 July 2009
  • Conclusion: This is one of the worst L lens in Canon's line. It is not sharp at all. I have been shooting Canon for 10 years now and this lens just doesn't cut it.
  • Cons: Semi-sharp images, Poor build quality, not sharp
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Take care

Portaderry, Amazon
11 October 2013
  • Summary: I've had this lens for some time now. I've therefore had alot of experience with it. The quality is very good but no more than that. I was bitterly disappointed when almost all the photos in a shoot, suffered severe vignetting as a result of using the hood.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Not for me

Nevik, WEX
29 May 2013
  • Summary: I had one on a 550D for some time. I use Canon FF D cameras day in day out. I bought the 550D for a specific task.I found the 10-22 a bit flimsy and prone to flair. Most of my lenses are L, I would of bought L for the 550D if there had been any.Lack of quality glass in the cropped format I think...
  • Pros: Lightweight
  • Cons: Flimsy
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

A very pricey head ache.

dannysubliminal, Amazon
25 January 2013
  • Summary: I bought this lens a year ago to take with me to the USA on a mini tour. I'm a landscape photographer and was in need of some extreme wide angles, however I recently upgraded to a full frame camera purely because of this lens, reasons as follows 1.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Poor resolution disappoints

Richard, Amazon
13 August 2009
  • Summary: I'd heard great things about this lens, and having used the Tokina 11-16mm before, in addition to a Rokinon 8mm fisheye, I was interested to see how this lens would measure up. Unfortunately I've not been too impressed for the following reasons: 1) Distortion is poorly controlled, particularly at...
  • Read full review
Next page >>