Reviews and Problems with Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Showing 1-10 of 14
Value for money 4
Overall quality 2
qaulity short lived
13 July 2012
Conclusion: This is the 4th Canon lens I have owned. I never had any trouble with my previous Canon products. After 7 months of normal use the len became very loose in the mid section. This problem is not coverd by the warranty. I don't know how often this happens or what caused problem. I was always very careful with this lens as with all my lenses.
Summary: I see a lot of people writing that this lens is very and even extremely sharp. Same with the colors. I ordered this lens in Feb but was sold out at that time. In May they came available again so i received mine a couple of weeks ago. Just sent him back to Amazon because it was the opposite. Made exactly the same pictures with the Kitlens (18-55 from 150$) who where way more better than this 850$ piece.
Summary: I've had this lens for some time now. I've therefore had alot of experience with it. The quality is very good but no more than that. I was bitterly disappointed when almost all the photos in a shoot, suffered severe vignetting as a result of using the hood. Whilst this is a good size of a lens for certain purposes, you must be aware of its limitations, which for a Canon, are many.
Summary: I had one on a 550D for some time. I use Canon FF D cameras day in day out. I bought the 550D for a specific task.I found the 10-22 a bit flimsy and prone to flair. Most of my lenses are L, I would of bought L for the 550D if there had been any.Lack of quality glass in the cropped format I think holds the format back.Not a dreadful lens by any means, just not an L.
Summary: I'd heard great things about this lens, and having used the Tokina 11-16mm before, in addition to a Rokinon 8mm fisheye, I was interested to see how this lens would measure up. Unfortunately I've not been too impressed for the following reasons: 1) Distortion is poorly controlled, particularly at the wider end. I'd go as far as to say that the Rokinon performs better at 8mm than the Canon does at 10mm - then again, the Rokinon is a prime.
Summary: I bought this lens a year ago to take with me to the USA on a mini tour. I'm a landscape photographer and was in need of some extreme wide angles, however I recently upgraded to a full frame camera purely because of this lens, reasons as follows 1. At its widest angle the barrel distortion horizontally is terrible and barely fixable in photoshop however this is expected on a crop sensor camera (EFS lenses are not compatible on full frame cameras), its not so bad in the...
Summary: Aufgrund der vielen 5 Sterne Bewertungen habe ich mir dieses Objektiv bestellt und mit dem sigma 10-20 f3.5 verglichen. Viele Testberichte bescheinigtem dem Sigma eine miserable Performance an Bildrändern und Ecken, insbesondere bei Offenblende. Und ja, das Canon hat bei Offenblende und zwar auschließlich bei Offenblende die Schärferen Bildecken (wobei die Definition von Schärfe in den Bildecken bei 10mm Brennweite ohnehin relativ ist in meinen Augen).