www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
8.3 out of 10

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

The Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM is equipped with a telephot Read more

Great Deal: $164.95

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Showing 1-10 of 16
Overall 2
2.0

Big disappointment

olcay, Amazon
5 July 2014
  • Summary: I received the product and I returned at the same day. It was big disappointment for me. When it came, the lid was shrunk and stuck in front of lens. It didn't come out. I bought this product because it was cheaper than others, but I experienced why it was cheaper.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0
Value for money 6
6.0
Features 10
10
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

Not sharp

Tomt, Canon
16 March 2013
  • Conclusion: This lens works well for shots that are close. Zoomed all the way out nothing is sharp. It's not much good for long distance bird shots. I also think it is a bit slow on the auto focus which I could live with if the pictures were sharp. Mostly a costly disappointment.
  • Pros: Superior build quality
  • Cons: Semi-sharp images
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0
Value for money 2
2.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 2
2.0

Very unsatisfied

wv_kid, Canon
9 March 2013
  • Conclusion: This lense will not focus when zoomed at 300mm. Most pictures are blurry. I have an efs 55mm to 250 mm that blows the socks off of this one and costed half as much. I expected more from Canon than what i got.
  • Cons: Semi-sharp images
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Very soft lens

Jordan, B&H Photo
12 September 2012
  • Excerpt: I bought this lens in Jan '09 when I first got all my camera gear. It has served well, very sturdy and nothing wrong with it to this day. My photography interest is more for macro but I'm now getting into the birds and using it more and more, but it's simply not good enough.
  • Pros: Durable, Lightweight, Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light, Slow Focus, Soft
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Got what I payed for

Birder, B&H Photo
25 February 2012
  • Excerpt: Main use if for bird photos @300mm Main advantage, is that it is light, relatively small & inexpensive. A good walk-around lens. Unless my copy is out-of-cal,for my use at 300mm it is disappointing, with no resolution details. For decent photos, I revert to my 400mm 5.6, and bear the extra weight.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Easily Interchangeable, Lightweight
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Very Disappointed

Rotifer, B&H Photo
26 October 2010
  • Excerpt: Like many, I exhaustingly researched this lens vs. the F4 L before ignoring the smattering of poor reviews and getting the 70-300. Washed out color, soft images and found the focus to hunt when you need it to lock-up quickly.
  • Pros: Easily Interchangeable, Rugged
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Poor in Low Light, Slow Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

One of the worst lenses I have ever used

Vidas, B&H Photo
21 July 2008
  • Excerpt: Read few genearly positive reviews here before renting this lense for a weekend. What a disapointment! The only usable range where image is still somewhat sharp is around 70-100mmm. Colors are dull. And of coure, it is DARK.
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Weak Casing
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0
Value for money 2
2.0

User Review

Photography Review
8 May 2006
  • Summary: Purchased this lens with Canon eos 20-d, found to be overall soft, 200+ images all sole ft. Contacted Canon TS, was informed there currently is an unresolved focusing issue with this lens. Placed on a recall list when solution is discoved will be notified to return for adjustments.
  • Pros: fast focus, light weight
  • Cons: Softness
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Very disappointed

Mr A Fisher, Amazon
21 January 2014
  • Summary: A very disappointing purchase. I could not achieve sharp focus photographs with it. It was so soft-focus that I traded it in afterwards, incurring a loss of most of its value. I have never traded-in a lens, so soon after buying it, ever before.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Do not buy this as a Diffractive Optics (DO) lens

Geoff, Amazon
16 February 2009
  • Summary: The lens illustrated here is not the DO version of this lens, which is more than twice the price and available elsewhere on Amazon. The proper DO lens is a superb, light weight zoom lens. The non-DO version masquerading as the genuine article is a poor substitute and not even worth the price quoted.
  • Read full review
Next page >>