www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-ef-70-200mm-f-4l-usm.299260
8.8 out of 10

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM provides ultra wide-angle cover Read more

Great Deal: $709.00

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Showing 1-10 of 279
Overall 8
8.0

Amazing Image Quality. Low Light okay

Matt Byck, B&H Photo
3 weeks ago
  • Excerpt: This lens is amazing especially considering it is the cheapest L-Series ever made. If you have a little more money to spend i would invest in the IS version of this lens. If you don't, however, this is quite possibly the greatest 70-200 f/4 available. Low light performance on this lens is not exceptional unless you have a tripod.
  • Pros: Durable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Nice Bokeh, Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Great Pictures on my first day out

Stevie Wonderful, B&H Photo
21 November 2014
  • Excerpt: I purchased this lens for the quality I expected from an L series lens and was not disappointed in my initial day of shooting. While my preference is landscape photography and I usually require a wider lens when I do shoot, I was not able to get the wide shots that I wanted until I changed to my ef24-105 L4, I was still impressed with the shots I was able to get of the foliage in Central Park in the fall.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Heavy
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

love this lens

M., B&H Photo
20 October 2014
  • Excerpt: I love this lens I received it a couple weeks ago and I am in love! Beautiful quality and sharp. Perfect for my needs!
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Big performance, Small package

BCPix, B&H Photo
16 September 2014
  • Excerpt: After years and years of shooting with the Canon 70-200 f2.8, I recently purchased the f4 model and have been thouroughly impressed. Much, much smaller and lighter, super image quality. Great lens when f2.8 is not an absolute necessity, which is less and les often as high ISO quality in newer camera continues to improve. I love the samller size and manageabilty of this lens along with it's great performace.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Strong Construction
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

One of the best deals in quality lenses

MrB, B&H Photo
3 September 2014
  • Excerpt: Really happy with it. Use the lens recreationally, mostly to take kids sports shots at a high shutter speed, the non-IS isn't really an issue.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Strong Construction
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Good but the newer model is great

FFX, B&H Photo
23 July 2014
  • Excerpt: This is a good lens but with out IS it is difficult to take great pictures for a non-professional photographer. The newer model is great.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Great lens for the cost

Brendan, B&H Photo
14 May 2014
  • Excerpt: Having a 70-200mm lens in my toolbag was necessary, but working on a limited budget, the f/4L version of this lens serves my needs perfectly.
  • Pros: Cost, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Image quality, Lightweight, Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Budget Version, No Hard Focus Stops
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Great Lens

CWink, B&H Photo
14 April 2014
  • Excerpt: This is a great lens! Obviously it is the lesser options of 4 canon lenses, but it is a sharp lens and great for the price!
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Good product

Alfred, B&H Photo
1 April 2014
Overall 8
8.0

Happy - to a point

Rachelle, B&H Photo
12 March 2014
  • Excerpt: Just starting out with a nicer camera and wanted to try a better lens. I wish I had gone with the 2.8 instead of the 4 but cost was a driving factor for me. I think I will be happy with it - but not thrilled. It is light so that is nice - I may change my mind after playing with it more.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Lightweight
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
Next page >>