www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM
8.8 out of 10

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS Read more

Great Deal: $1,099.99

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Showing 131-140 of 500
Overall 8
8.0

Still new to me

Ed, B&H Photo
25 June 2013
  • Excerpt: Lens is sharper at f5.6 than f4. Some images are very sharp, others are not at all. I am in the early stages of using the lens. Further testing is needed, but am concerned about the occasional blown focus.
  • Pros: Durable, Nice Bokeh, Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Blurry Focus
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great alternative to 2.8 IS

Rocky Mnt Photographer, B&H Photo
17 June 2013
  • Excerpt: I looked into pages and pages of reviews before buying this lens. Of course I wanted the 2.8IS but I couldn't afford or rationalize paying for it when I could just rent it for the shoots that I needed it for (infrequent).
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Nice Bokeh
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

1000 dollars wont buy a better lens

schwinn_traveler_38.9, Ebay
16 June 2013
  • Summary: This is THE go-to lens for anyone on ANY size sensor, 1.6x, 1.3 or full frame. Images are tack sharp and its MTF charts are bested only by lenses that cost several thousand dollars. The stabilizer is good for 4 stops and works great for pans.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Incredible lens

EVPhotography, B&H Photo
16 June 2013
  • Excerpt: Outstanding lens, so Sharp at almost every aperture. IS works great, don't come any better for a zoom lens. As good as most primes and better then some.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Good compromise

Dave, B&H Photo
15 June 2013
  • Excerpt: This is a great lens, no doubt about it. The f2.8 however, is better. BUT - it's much heavier, and much more expensive. So, for the money (in comparison to the f2.8), it is a very good compromise. You may lose 10% of the ability, for 70% bnefit in costs and weight. In my head, that's worthwhile.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10
Value for money 8
8.0
Features 10
10
Performance 10
10
Overall quality 10
10

Unbelievable

dugole, Canon
12 June 2013
  • Conclusion: Absolutely an unbelievable lens. My previous Canon 70-200 was the f4 non-stablized - I liked it but didn't use it often because it needed a high shutter speed (at least 1/250) and the results weren't quite as sharp as I had hoped (date coded as 2005).
  • Pros: Fast auto-focus, Superior build quality, Super-sharp images, light weight
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

"Fantabulous" Canon 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens

Desert Peep, Amazon
10 June 2013
  • Summary: First, I acquired my copy of the Canon 70-200mm f/4.0 IS USM lens from another source. This was my first L-series lens purchase. I bought this L-series lens new shortly after buying my Canon 50D. This lens has now been an integral part of my camera bag for a couple of years.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Good, but not great

Jeff, B&H Photo
5 June 2013
  • Excerpt: It's well built, but for an L lens I expected it to be sharper. It's about the same sharpness as a similar Tamron lens, and just a little sharper than my Canon 55-250mm kit lens.
  • Pros: Durable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Could be sharper
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great addition

Dmilgram, B&H Photo
3 June 2013
  • Excerpt: Right out of the box, my pix were sharper and clearer. Great addition to my 24-105L.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Amazing Lens At Half The Weight

Ridgeroamer, B&H Photo
3 June 2013
  • Excerpt: I use this lens in a variety of situations, from event photograpy to wild life photos. I considered both the f/2.8 and the f4.0. For me the decision was quite simple, money aside, both lenses have great reviews.
  • Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Nice Bokeh, Rugged, Strong Construction
  • Cons: Poor in Low Light
  • Read full review
<< Previous page Next page >>