www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-ef-70-200mm-f-2-8l-is-usm.299281
8.8 out of 10

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM features Canon’s second generati Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Showing 1-10 of 306

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM review by mariuspavel

slrgear.com
19 July 2014
  • Summary: I tested this lens a week ago and it looks and performs good, but i prefer Mark 2 version that i own. Pictures a took with this lens: www.mariuspavel.ro/foto-nunta-zarnesti-eliza-si-cornel/
  • Pros: sharp and buid quality
  • Cons: price - better IS on Mark 2 version
  • Read full review

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM review by Danno

Danno, slrgear.com
18 May 2014
  • Summary: Bought this lens second hand from a shop yesterday. I wanted to buy the 4IS, but bought this lens instead. Despite reports of this lens not being sharp at 200mm, I find this lens sufficiently sharp at 2.8. Yesterday I was carrying my gear through an afternoon of shopping with wife and daughter to test the weight. I find the lens less heavy than expected. Most people complain too much? I have tested this lens against 200mm F/2.8 fixed and the 70-200mm F/4 IS.
  • Pros: Build quality, sharp at 2.8
  • Cons: Fragile hood
  • Read full review

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM review by hansdampf

hansdampf, slrgear.com
9 May 2014
  • Summary: I don't carry many lenses for a wedding, but this thing is always in my bag. I have, like so many I suppose, thought about replacing it with primes just because they are lighter and can open even further to let in more light, but there is just no alternative to it. The image quality is just amazing, even at f/2.8. It has IS which as for now the primes don't have.
  • Pros: Image Quality, Bokeh, Build Quality, IS
  • Cons: Weight, Price, Bulky Size
  • Read full review

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM review by cputeq

cputeq, slrgear.com
29 June 2012
  • Summary: I picked up this lens used from the FM B&S forum a couple of weeks ago. Seller had lost the tripod foot, but lens was in good condition and the price was right. I used to own the 70-200 2.8 MK II, so I had something to compare this lens with. I have also owned the Tamron 70-200 on Sony A77, the Sigma 70-200 HSM II Macro on a D7000, and a Pentax 50-135mm on a K20D. I also owned, for a very short while, the Nikon 70-200 VR I on a D300.
  • Pros: Fast, accurate AF. Sharp throughout range. Decent used pricing now.
  • Cons: Not as sharp as the MK II at 200mm, MFD is only decent, weight after a while.
  • Read full review

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM review by JRenato

JRenato, slrgear.com
13 January 2012
  • Summary: Zoom de Qualidade Superior. Exelente em todas as distâncias focais. Nitidez e Contastes Irretocáveis. Foco de Altíssima Velocidade. Talvez o Melhor zoom 70x200 2.8 !!!!!
  • Pros: Talvez a melhor em sua categoria.
  • Cons: Nada.
  • Read full review

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM review by Ashley_Pomeroy

Ashley_Pomeroy, slrgear.com
21 October 2011
  • Summary: I've had one of these for a while. As of 2011 it still costs a fortune on the used market, but it's very good at what it does, and although there are compromises they are overwhelmed by the sheer practicality of the thing. It was sickeningly painful handing over the cash for it - the same money will buy a used 85mm f/1.2, or a brand-new non-stabilised 70-200mm f/2.8, for example, and that's a tough choice - but and but and and etc.
  • Pros: Solid; consistent image quality; extremely practical
  • Cons: Heavy; huge; awkward tripod foot
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Amazing Lens but to IS or not to IS? That is the question!

Ricardo A. Sevilla, Amazon
24 September 2010
  • Summary: I gathered all my non L lenses together and sold them off to purchase this lens. I must say, I am glad I did. After buying this lens I have not had the need to buy any other lens. It serves as my all purpose lens for portrait shoots, for landscapes, for sports...for anything. The images are VERY sharp...no...EXTREMELY sharp. You will be blown away by the quality this lens can produce. Downside: The lens is pretty heavy.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Stop stressing over it and jump in -- you will love it!

coachboz, Amazon
1 September 2010
  • Summary: I agonized over this one for a YEAR. I am not a professional photographer by trade, but have come to love it as my hobby. When I recently upgraded from a Rebel to my 7D, I felt it was time to take the plunge. Man oh man, am I glad I did! My daughter is in gymnastics and they perform in caves. OK, not literally, but trust me when I say the lighting is as bad as it gets. With this lens, I was able to shoot at f2.8 1/250 @ 3200 ISO and got some amazing shots.
  • Read full review

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM review by touristguy87

touristguy87, slrgear.com
12 September 2009
  • Summary: I had this lens for a week. It's just not all that much. Aside from the obvious stuff like the weight (it's about the weight of a freaking cinderblock) and the size (it's like carrying around your forearm, though it will fit in a backpack), it has a few sneaky cons to it. But I will sum it up by saying that if you need this lens then you will deal with the cons (and they are numerous), if you don't really need this lens, then you will happily return it.
  • Pros: the pros are just not all that great for the cons
  • Cons: the obvious: size, weight, limited focal-length range...cost...
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10
Value for money 10
10

User Review

gahspidy, Photography Review
20 June 2009
  • Summary: Several months ago I finally decided to shell out the 1400.00 on this lens. Quite simply it is one of the best investments in photography that I have ever made. The lens is outstanding, both in build quality and performance. Having a constant 2.8 aperture AND IS has enabled me to capture images that would have otherwise just been impossible.
  • Pros: Everything
  • Cons: Costly, but I don't believe overly expensive. this is one good piece of glass.
  • Read full review
Next page >>