www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-ef-70-200mm-f-2-8l-is-ii-usm.29016077
10 out of 10

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Improving upon one of the most celebrated lenses in the Canon EF Read more

Great Deal: $23.15

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Showing 1-10 of 15
Overall 6
6.0

70-200mm...So-So

Troy, B&H Photo
9 June 2014
  • Excerpt: That was money that was "easier gone, than, easier came". Am I glad I bought it? No; but I'm content. I'm not wealthy, and I spend wisely, perhaps this was not a good purchase. I am holding out hope that with a lot of practice I'll get some good use from it. Is it fast? Yes. Are the pic's sharp? Yes. Will it get used much? Jury is out.
  • Cons: Heavy, Questionable Mount Integr
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Long Break-in Curve

MDob, B&H Photo
27 August 2012
  • Excerpt: The EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Telephoto Zoom Lens appears to have a much steeper learning curve than my other two Canon L lenses. Please note that I am using this lens on a T4I (Canon seems to be delaying replacing the 7D with a units that is more representative of current technology, so I decided to wait, but play with a T4I since I liked the T2I, even though both are entry-level EOS products.
  • Pros: Durable, Reliable
  • Cons: Bulky, Difficult To Use
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Hefty Price for the Performance

Greg the Typical Dad, B&H Photo
17 January 2012
  • Excerpt: I have used this lens to replace a 55-250mm non-L I borrowed from a friend. I use the lens primarily for higher speed sporting events such as football, baseball and basketball. The 2.8 is nice, but not needed outdoors. And it is still not fast enough to keep a reasonable ISO setting indoors in a gymnasium. The extreme cost as compared to the 55-250mm provides almost no value to me as a dad shooting my sons in random activities.
  • Pros: 28 aperture
  • Cons: Bulky Design, expensive, Heavy, No Increase In Performance
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

As good as the OLD!

Joe P, B&H Photo
10 October 2011
  • Excerpt: It's as good as my older "I" model, yet to see benefits of newer.
  • Cons: No Increase In Performance
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

A classic pro lens technically upgraded

AndrewD, B&H Photo
16 September 2011
  • Excerpt: Very nice lens, good for sports but low light capabilities. Be aware that is heavy!
  • Pros: Improves Picture Quality
  • Cons: Bulky Design
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 6
6.0
Features 8
8.0
Performance 6
6.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

Not impressed

1golfer, Canon
31 May 2011
  • Conclusion: I bought this lens along with the EOS 7D and I have not been impressed by any means. I'm hoping i just have a fualty lens. I struggle to get crisp pictures and shooting in low light is even worse. I like to do a lot of birthday parties and I've had to go to my cheap little 50mm lens because i just don't trust this lens. I ahve gotten some good pictures with it but I don't find it reliable..I really hope it either me doing something wrong or a faulty lens!!!
  • Cons: Slow auto-focus, Semi-sharp images
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Cheap Filter

Eagle2000, Amazon
4 May 2011
  • Summary: The Filter lumped together with the camera is cheap: A Zeikos UV protecotor costs only $3. The filter is overpriced here in this package. This filter is of bad quality and will ruin the good quality this camera supposed to bring. You are better off by just shopping for the camera alone.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Canon quality

John, B&H Photo
10 February 2011
  • Excerpt: I sold my orginal Canon 70mm-200mm IS to get this one on all the reviews I have read on how great this II version is. For this new II version, at the 70mm end, it is disappointing soft. At the 200mm end, it is tack sharp. I have a choice to return this lens to B&H for another one, or I can send it to Canon Service Center for recalibration. [...
  • Pros: Durable, Reliable
  • Cons: Bulky
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Better than it's predecessor???

Harry76, B&H Photo
26 December 2010
  • Excerpt: I have been engaged in photography for more than 40 years with a statistical process improvement background. So I was more than interested to see if the 70-200 f-2.8 L II was significantly better than the L I. After 2 days of intensive testing my findings using both an EOS 1DS and 20D body are as follows. Contrast for the L II was slightly better.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Is it worth it?

FSandy, B&H Photo
29 August 2010
  • Excerpt: Too much money. I don't see a different between this one and the older one. Yes its a great lens but so is the old one.
  • Read full review
Next page >>