Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM
Showing 1-10 of 14
Albe9, B&H Photo
3 April 2014
Excerpt: I read a lot about the loud noise of the IS however, to be honest with you, it doesn't bother it, it just reminds me that it's on and working. Other than not being a true hand held lens to work with, even with the IS, I was a little disappointed with the image quality.
Pros: Durable, Nice Bokeh, Rugged, Strong Construction
Excerpt: Before I get into the details, I want to note that other reviewers (such as photozone.de) have reported on significant differences between samples and likely this is what I saw. I own the 200mm F/2.8 L and 400mm F/5.6 L and wanted something in between and with IS.
Pros: Fast / accurate auto-focus, Nice Bokeh, Rugged, Strong Construction
Excerpt: Bought this to replace 400mm f/5.6. Wanted IS and f/4. Not really that impressed. IS seems just OK and I get sharper pics with 400mm f/5.6. Have to correct for abertations in Lightroom. I think of this as the poormans's 300mm.
Conclusion: I recently sold my 2011 300mm f4 IS lens after about six months of ownership. It was the perfect size and weight for a 300mm prime, and the short minimum focus distance was ideal for a variety of subjects. It had an excellent sliding lens hood and a nice soft case was supplied at no additional cost.
Conclusion: I've owned three of these over the years looking for the lens some people say they have. These lenses have been a disappointment to me in terms of pure sharpness and contrast compared with my old EF 300 2.8L.
Pros: Superior build quality, Fast auto-focus, dual mode is, relatively small and light