Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM
8.4 out of 10

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM The Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM Read more

Great Deal: $1,299.00

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

Showing 1-10 of 10

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM Lens Review

SLR Lens and Camera Reviews
1 June 2009
  • Summary: Considering the overall performance, build quality, features and reasonable pricing (reasonable is a relative term here), Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM measures up quite nicely against other long telephoto lenses available on the market.
  • Read full review

REVIEW: Canon EF 300mm f/4 L IS USM

29 July 2008
  • Conclusion: The build quality alone qualifies the price of this lens, which appears as though it will outlast any owner! The built in hood is a neat touch that just about escapes getting in the way of filters. The only let down is the slightly sluggish (for the class of lens) autofocus.
  • Pros: Excellent build quality, Good contrast and colour rendition, Retractable lens hood a nice touch.
  • Cons: AF a little slow for class of lens, Resolution may not be up to future sensors (although pixel race has now slowed)
  • Read full review

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM lens

Images by William Castleman
2 May 2008
  • Excerpt: This is a sharp, compact and light weight, image-stabilized lens that packs a lot of performance into a relatively affordable package. There is a widespread view that the image stabilized (IS) version of the EF 300mm f/4 is not quite as sharp as the earlier non-IS view.
  • Read full review

Expert Review

29 April 2008
  • Excerpt: This article covers both the old (non-image stabilized) and new (IS) versions of the Canon EOS 300/4. The photos are by Philip Greenspun and were taken with a Canon EOS 5D , ( compare prices ) ( review ) for the Africa articles in our Travel section .
  • Read full review

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM Lens

The Digital Picture
3 April 2007
  • Excerpt: Is the Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM Lens right for you? Learn all you need to know in The-Digital-Picture.com's review!
  • Read full review

EF 300 mm f/4L IS USM

13 November 2009
  • Conclusion: The Canon EF 300 mm f/4L IS USM is a very well-done lens, and the comparison between the cons and the pros can be the proof of it. Mind you the cons are the effect of the age – after all, the lens was launched 10 years ago.
  • Cons: average work against bright light,, stabilization efficient only at the level of 2 EV.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
Value for money 7
Overall quality 6
Build quality 10

Canon EF 300mm f/4 USM L IS - Full Format Review / Test

2 August 2008
  • Conclusion: In the marketplace the Canon EF 300mm f/4 USM L IS is probably suffering from the fact that it is "only" a 300mm lens. There are numerous zoom lenses with such a tele setting out including the stiff in-house competition from the similar priced EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 USM L IS and the new EF 70-300mm...
  • Read full review

Expert Review

25 February 2015
  • Excerpt: Высококачественный телеобъектив для съемки спортивных состязаний, птиц, диких животных и др. Высочайшее качество профессиональной серии Canon L, низкий вес (1190 гр), оптический стабилизатор, круглая 8-лепестковая диафрагма, низкодисперсионные и флюоритовые линзы, кольцевой ультразвуковой привод...
  • Read full review Translate to English

Canon EF 300/4,0 L IS USM

16 January 2014
  • Summary: Canon EF 300/4L IS USM är ett smidigt och bra alternativ till de betydligt klumpigare och tyngre L-teleobjektiven med högre ljusstyrka eller längre brännvidd. Bildkvalitetsmässigt är detta också oftast ett mycket bättre alternativ än att komplettera kortare brännvidder med telekonverter, och gäller...
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 8

Expert Review

7 May 2008
  • Summary: Jak pokazał nasz test, Samsung NX10 ma sporo zalet ale nie jest pozbawiony wad. Można jednak uznać, że jest to udana inauguracja systemu NX, którego rozwój jest dla Samsunga priorytetem.
  • Cons: automatyczne odszumianie plików JPEG, szczególnie intensywne na wysokich czułościach,, problemy z automatycznym balansem bieli w przypadku światła żarowego,, tendencja do przesycania kolorów w JPEG,, spadek nasycenia kolorów na wysokich ISO na plikach RAW,, ingerencja w RAW-y na poziomie prądu ci...
  • Read full review Translate to English