Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM
Showing 1-4 of 4
Was disappointed and not what I was expecting from a Canon product.
Susan B Brim, Amazon
31 December 2013
Summary: Did not take a sharp picture and auto focus locked up at least once. Tried lens for 2 weeks and didn't improve with use. I currently use a Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II USM which is a faster lens, but wanted one that was more versatile and had more power.
Summary: I bought it because where I shoot ( Desert and mountains) I have to be extracareful when I change lens ( dust, sand) are killers. Solutions ? Get only one lens !!! Beautiful machine on the paper. So beautiful that I bought it, but it has a huge problem: the pull and push structure of the zoom makes it a real dust vacuum which makes it useless for outdoor photography. DO the TEST while pushing and pulling bring the lens to the ear and listen you'll hear the air sucking.
Pros: IS very efficient, Sharp, AF fast, can check quality on www.buyphotoarts.com check wildlife Latin america., But Had todo huge post prod to clean the shots.
Cons: Its bone structure Push pull too long, too strong , too powerful like a dyson vacuum cleaner., No dust proofing
Summary: This L series lens is exactly what the travel photographer wants. Mostly. It's a perfect focal length range for a full frame camera body, it is very sharp and despite and extended focal length range does not exhibit significant barrel or pincushion distortion. f/3.5 at 28mm is not bad and the f/5.6 at 300mm is very usable. The lens has two stage image stabilization that works very well, and in my own tests gave on average 3 stops of stabilization capability.
Summary: Ich war knapp davor dieses Objektiv zu kaufen, da mir der Zoombereich für das Fotografieren auf Reisen ideal zu sein schien. Als ich aber die Testergebnisse auf traumflieger.de angesehen habe, war ich über die Werte etwas erschüttert. Ich hätte erwartet, dass L-Klasse-Objektive von Canon sich vor allem durch Schärfe der Bilder auszeichnen. Stattdessen liegen die Werte für die Auflösung in den Tabellen von traumflieger.de fast durchgängig unter 2000 Linien.