Summary: Great buy for the money. Very usable and performs like a more expensive lense. I would recommend this for those looking for a good multipurpose wide angle lense without the super heavy pricetag.
Summary: Start with the Pros: Cheap - I got mine used for $180, with signs of usage but still perfectly functional. Sharp - Even wide open at F2.8, this lens is very sharp. Portable - It's very light, it's a bit lighter than 50mm F1.4 I think. It's small, it fits in small camera bag with my 5D MKII. Cons: Loud Focus - It doesn't have USM. Poor Built - Comparing it to 50mm 1.4 (which costs about the same), it doesn't have as good built quality and it has an old design.
Summary: This lens is a great compact lens. If you wanted to travel as light as possible, this is a great choice. It is wide enough for scenic shots, and great for street and distorted people shots. I wish this version had an Ultrasonic motor, but for the price, I can live with the buzzy motor. It also gives you an extra stop of useable light. The sharpness is still good wide open, but stopped down to f5.6 it is great.
Summary: Great high speed lens to use when space doesn't allow me to go with my 50mm F1.8 which is my favorite low light lens. This 24mm is a little better build quality, but not as sharp as the 50mm. But you still can't go wrong.
Summary: This is a great prime lens for a camera that accepts FD mount lenses. 24mm works great for indoor and group photos as well as fun handheld self ports. ƒ2.8 is fast enough to take decent shots in lower light.
Summary: This is a cheap lens - old design, very plastic - that can prove terribly useful for those on a budget who want a wider perspective, especially on 1.6x crop factor dSLRs. I learned about "cheap" with this lens - broke the focus ring the day after delivery. But I blame myself too, and the replacement's given me no trouble, though I think my first one was a bit sharper than the second.
Summary: I was on the lookout for a good-quality autofocus wide angle lens for my Canon 5D MkII, and this seemed to be the best option. Canon's telephoto lenses are generally superb and they make some good zooms, but the company has traditionally had trouble with the wider focal lengths. I can't justify the expense of a 24-70mm f/2.8 or the 24mm f/1.4, and the 17-40mm and 16-35mm seem either underwhelming or too specialised for what they are.
Summary: I have an EOS 7D that I bought with the Canon 60mm 2.8 Macro lens. I am very happy with that lens so naturally that is what I compare other lenses to since it is my only point of reference. I quickly realized that I needed a wider angle lens but did not like the quality of all the zoom lenses so I quickly settled on buying a prime. After reading some poor reviews of the 24 and 28mm Canon lenses I went with the Sigma 24mm 1.8 lens.
Summary: From all the reviews I read, I expected certain pros and cons from this lens. I was not disappointed. pros: very sharp lens with very good colors cons: vignetting at wide open, and a little too contrasty For myself, the pros outweighed the cons for the price. It is ideal for the 1.6 multiplier cameras, where it becomes a 38mm lens.