www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-ef-24-70mm-f-2-8l-usm.299252
8.7 out of 10

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Lens comes with an extended coverage Read more

Great Deal: $1,429.00

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Showing 1-10 of 22
Overall 3
3.0

User Review

harrappeter, Fredmiranda
12 December 2011
  • Conclusion: Not as good as a good 24-85mm f3.5-4.5 .
  • Pros: Though heavy on a 1Ds it handles well and the hood protects against rain as well as against flare. autofocus is good and it balances well with my body
  • Cons: But, and it is a big but, I have so far had the use of four new ones, none of which is anywhere near as good as my 24-85mm f3.5-4.5mm. Curvature of field is so bad that it is like a magic lens. You can focus across a wide street at buildings on the other side, shooting down the street, and getting focus confirmation on the central AF point as usual, and where the point is focussed it will be sharp, but whereas my 24-85mm at 24mm will render everything in focus even at...
  • Read full review
Overall 3
3.0

User Review

J-Dawgg, Fredmiranda
9 July 2010
  • Conclusion: I rented one of these from a vey reputable shop after my 28-70L was stolen. Now, especially after reading some of the comments here, I can't decide if I really want to buy one or look for a good used 28-70L. First of all, when I cranked the lens all the way open to 24mm, it "locked up" there. Like there's a light notch in the barrel that intentionally holds it at 24mm.
  • Pros: Wider aperature than the 28-70L
  • Cons: Weight, "Bad Copy-itis," lock-down at 24mm, doesn't register images with 580 EX
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

stevesanacore, Fredmiranda
7 September 2008
  • Conclusion: I have too many ruined shots to recommend this lens. Typical Canon mediocre quality of their wide angle lenses. I only shoot full frame 5D and 1Ds Mk3, so for APS sized users it may be a better performer.
  • Pros: Great focal length range.
  • Cons: Poor performance. To soft on edges compared with prime lenses to be useful for landscape work.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Poor quality for the high price.

David, B&H Photo
27 May 2008
  • Summary: Focus is soft across most of the lenses focal length. It will only provide tack sharp images if the subject is within 15 feet or less, a flash is used (still not consistent however), and you are at no more than f-4.5 to 9.0. Every image above f-11 to f-22 is soft no matter what the focal length. The lens is also extremely heavy on my Canon 40D and makes it very difficult to hold the camera steady unless a tripod is used.
  • Pros: Strong Construction
  • Cons: Blurry Focus, Heavy
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

devan40D, Fredmiranda
23 May 2008
  • Conclusion: I recently bought a Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens for my Canon 40 D and found that in bright sun light IQ was fantastic. Build quality was excellent, presence of the lens is unrivalled, you could walk in to a room full of photographers and get attention immediately. Pin point sharp pictures that could be blown uo to any size without loosing sharpness.
  • Pros: I recently bought a Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens for my Canon 40 D and found that in bright sun light IQ was fantastic. Build quality was excellent, presence of the lens is unrivalled, you could walk in to a room full of photographers and get attention immediately. Pin point sharp pictures that could be blown uo to any size without loosing sharpness.
  • Cons: But in low light and in Flash light photography the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM used in conjunction with either 40 D or 400 D gave images that were soft. Very disappointing and painfull after reading some rave reviews. I sold the lens at a loss to someone who did most of his photography outdoors.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Could go either way

Jim, B&H Photo
15 April 2008
  • Summary: Couldn't decide between 24-70 and 24-105 IS. Doesn't seem like the sharpest piece of glass I've ever owned, not the worst, but certainly not the best. Could be the lens, could be the camera. Expected to be blown away. Wasn't. Not bad, but not great. If you lack the technical expertise to extract the maximum from all your equipment, you probably won't see the difference between this and the 28-135, which is much less expensive.
  • Pros: Strong Construction
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

not dependable

Nicole, B&H Photo
2 March 2008
  • Summary: This lens is the least dependable lens that the studio owns. It regularly backfocuses, even after 2 trips to CPS. Spend your bucks on something else!
  • Cons: back focus problems, Heavy
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

24-70 L lens

tracykreck, epinions.com
29 July 2006
  • Excerpt: Don't buy it...I thought I would get amazing clarity with a high end Canon lens, especially at $1300
  • Pros: When it does focus properly, the images look great.
  • Cons: price, weight, unreliable, disappointments
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

20Dshooter, Fredmiranda
18 June 2005
  • Conclusion: A dissapointment. My Sigma 15-30 performs way better than this lens. Okay, I might have gotten a bad copy, but at this price point, one would think you should'nt have to worry about such things. Thumbs down for Canon.
  • Pros: Stopped down to f/4 and smaller, it can produce some nice shots. Built like a tank and very fast AF.
  • Cons: A huge amount of money to spend on a huge, heavy piece of glass, which is, at best, only mediocre.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

anatole, Fredmiranda
31 January 2005
  • Conclusion: My use of the 35mm format revolves completely around this type of lens. After buying four copies of Canon's 24-70 lens, I gave up on it. First, like the other reviewers, I couldn't find a copy that was sharp at f/2.8, which is unforgiveable. Second, the close focusing, while never the strong point of such a lens, was just abominable. After trying Nikon's 28-70 f/2.8, I dumped Canon and switched over to Nikon.
  • Pros: Fast AF, metal barrel.
  • Cons: Optical performance mixed.
  • Read full review
Next page >>