www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
8.2 out of 10

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Lens comes with an extended coverage Read more

Great Deal: $1,729.95

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Showing 1-10 of 22
Overall 3
3.0

User Review

harrappeter, Fredmiranda
12 December 2011
  • Conclusion: Not as good as a good 24-85mm f3.5-4.5 .
  • Pros: Though heavy on a 1Ds it handles well and the hood protects against rain as well as against flare. autofocus is good and it balances well with my body
  • Cons: But, and it is a big but, I have so far had the use of four new ones, none of which is anywhere near as good as my 24-85mm f3.5-4.5mm. Curvature of field is so bad that it is like a magic lens. You can focus across a wide street at buildings on the other side, shooting down the street, and gettin...
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Dissappointed, but not without reason

Abdul Hassan, Amazon
27 February 2011
  • Summary: I spent several months researching this lens. Countless hours going over sample images, and continuously feeling my heart skip, as I laid eyes on another breath taking image. I thought to myself that there is no way this lens can be that good. Unfortunately, I was right.
  • Read full review
Overall 3
3.0

User Review

J-Dawgg, Fredmiranda
9 July 2010
  • Conclusion: I rented one of these from a vey reputable shop after my 28-70L was stolen. Now, especially after reading some of the comments here, I can't decide if I really want to buy one or look for a good used 28-70L. First of all, when I cranked the lens all the way open to 24mm, it "locked up" there.
  • Pros: Wider aperature than the 28-70L
  • Cons: Weight, "Bad Copy-itis," lock-down at 24mm, doesn't register images with 580 EX
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

stevesanacore, Fredmiranda
7 September 2008
  • Conclusion: I have too many ruined shots to recommend this lens. Typical Canon mediocre quality of their wide angle lenses. I only shoot full frame 5D and 1Ds Mk3, so for APS sized users it may be a better performer.
  • Pros: Great focal length range.
  • Cons: Poor performance. To soft on edges compared with prime lenses to be useful for landscape work.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

devan40D, Fredmiranda
23 May 2008
  • Conclusion: I recently bought a Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens for my Canon 40 D and found that in bright sun light IQ was fantastic. Build quality was excellent, presence of the lens is unrivalled, you could walk in to a room full of photographers and get attention immediately.
  • Pros: I recently bought a Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens for my Canon 40 D and found that in bright sun light IQ was fantastic. Build quality was excellent, presence of the lens is unrivalled, you could walk in to a room full of photographers and get attention immediately. Pin point sharp pictures th...
  • Cons: But in low light and in Flash light photography the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM used in conjunction with either 40 D or 400 D gave images that were soft. Very disappointing and painfull after reading some rave reviews. I sold the lens at a loss to someone who did most of his photography outdoors.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

20Dshooter, Fredmiranda
18 June 2005
  • Conclusion: A dissapointment. My Sigma 15-30 performs way better than this lens. Okay, I might have gotten a bad copy, but at this price point, one would think you should'nt have to worry about such things. Thumbs down for Canon.
  • Pros: Stopped down to f/4 and smaller, it can produce some nice shots. Built like a tank and very fast AF.
  • Cons: A huge amount of money to spend on a huge, heavy piece of glass, which is, at best, only mediocre.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

anatole, Fredmiranda
31 January 2005
  • Conclusion: My use of the 35mm format revolves completely around this type of lens. After buying four copies of Canon's 24-70 lens, I gave up on it. First, like the other reviewers, I couldn't find a copy that was sharp at f/2.8, which is unforgiveable.
  • Pros: Fast AF, metal barrel.
  • Cons: Optical performance mixed.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

leuphrates, Fredmiranda
7 December 2004
  • Conclusion: Well, much cheaper and smaller lenses have similar or better image quality at f8 or f5.6. At f2.8 this lens is a looser. Wide side is so soft, simply not usable. Not a practical zoom range IMO considering the alternatives. "Big and heavy" is never a problem for me as long as a lens does its job.
  • Pros: Good Quality Closed down.
  • Cons: Wide side is soft, at f2.8 not usable. It has a problem with color rendering.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

L lover, Fredmiranda
12 October 2004
  • Conclusion: Allow me to be the only person on this site that gives this lens a bad review. I read almost everything that you guys have said about this lens and I after thinking about it forever, I bought it. For those who love this lens, I have to say great.
  • Pros: f/2.8
  • Cons: WEIGHT and SIZE. Too Expensive
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Unpleasant Suprsise

Mr. David P. Gilliver, Amazon
1 August 2011
  • Summary: Having read so much about this lens and the great quality imagery that it is capable of producing, I have been nothing but dissapointed by the results. I primarily take photographs at night (light painting) and thought that this lens would be perfect with its 2.8 aperture, but I have struggled to...
  • Read full review
Next page >>