www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-ef-24-70mm-f-2-8l-usm.299252
8.4 out of 10

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Lens comes with an extended coverage Read more

Great Deal: $24.99

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Showing 1-10 of 500
Overall 10
10

Lens of choice

Daryl distefano, Amazon
23 June 2014
  • Summary: I read a lot of reviews before purchasing my 24-70 L series lens. I'm sold She is my lens of choice. My other 4 lens are L series.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Great Results Easy to Use

David Arnold, Amazon
10 May 2014
  • Summary: I was using a kit zoom and I was out in on a windy day, when I got home I noticed dust in the View finder. I took the lens off; I saw dust throughout my camera even on the sensor. I had to buy a new focus screen; the old one couldn’t be cleaned. I was lucky to have the equipment to clean the sensor, or I would have to send the camera out for repair. This lens is light and sealed to dust and rain drops. Very easy to use and at (2.8) it’s awesome.
  • Read full review

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM review by 30/90

30/90, slrgear.com
10 March 2012
  • Summary: The most used lens in my arsenal. This lens stays on my 40D most of the time. It is a great walk around lens and provides tons of flexibility when touring. I find that the image quality is superb and f2.8 speed allows for easy low light shooting. It's my Go-To lens and I've used it more than any other lens in the bag.
  • Pros: Versatility, tack sharp images, color & contrast, build quality.
  • Cons: Some say weight is an issue...I have not found it objectionable.
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

User Review

Kevin Sherman, Fredmiranda
19 January 2012
  • Conclusion: Since I traded the 24-105L for this lens, it's by far my most used lens. Sharp, fast, flexible, 24mm is great on FF. It's big and heavy, but that doesn't bother me at all (I shoot with a 1DM3 + 70-200 f2.8L IS for 16 hour days). The lens hood is genius, providing excellent coverage whether you're at 24mm or 70mm. I mention build quality as a negative, here's why.
  • Pros: Money-maker. Sharp.
  • Cons: Build Quality
  • Read full review
Overall 3
3.0

User Review

harrappeter, Fredmiranda
12 December 2011
  • Conclusion: Not as good as a good 24-85mm f3.5-4.5 .
  • Pros: Though heavy on a 1Ds it handles well and the hood protects against rain as well as against flare. autofocus is good and it balances well with my body
  • Cons: But, and it is a big but, I have so far had the use of four new ones, none of which is anywhere near as good as my 24-85mm f3.5-4.5mm. Curvature of field is so bad that it is like a magic lens. You can focus across a wide street at buildings on the other side, shooting down the street, and getting focus confirmation on the central AF point as usual, and where the point is focussed it will be sharp, but whereas my 24-85mm at 24mm will render everything in focus even at...
  • Read full review

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM review by LF911SC

LF911SC, slrgear.com
29 November 2011
  • Summary: Bought this a week ago after a month living with the inferior 24-104 f/4 L. While the f/4 approached the look of the f/2.8 at the short end, there is no contest when looking at captures from the long side. Also seems like colors and contrast are much better through the 24-70. Another thing, even though both are designated "L" series lenses, the 24-70 is much better made, using more metal and less plastic that is used on the 24-105. Couldn't be happier.
  • Pros: Speed, Feel, Bokeh, Build, IQ
  • Cons: Weight?
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

User Review

filip_makowski, Fredmiranda
25 November 2011
  • Conclusion: I originally had the Sigma EX 24-70mm f/2.8 lens and found the image quality great for the price paid, however it did struggle with autofocus. I paid 3x as much for the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L, and yes the autofocus was much faster, and while the image quality wasn't that much better than the Sigmas, the colours were cleaner and contrast seemed slightly better.
  • Pros: Contrast, flare, accurate AF, sharp at f/2.8, solid build
  • Cons: Price
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

User Review

willis, Fredmiranda
9 October 2011
  • Conclusion: A real workhorse lens which won't let you down but also won't thrill the pixel-peepers. Would really benefit from IS. Range not really suited to 1.6 crop cameras IMO and performs better on FF/APS-H rather than the latest high pixel density smaller sensors. It's heavy for what it is but well balanced on pro camera bodies/gripped cameras.
  • Pros: Fast aperture, great colour and contrast, good bokeh for a zoom, built like a tank, useful range on FF and 1.3 crop.
  • Cons: Sharpness at f2.8 not up to the standards of Canons latest lenses, heavy, no IS. Must be due for a make-over soon.
  • Read full review

User Review

Andro Lesaca, Fredmiranda
6 October 2011
  • Conclusion: Correction: It's price is definitely a con.
  • Pros:
  • Cons:
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

User Review

Andro Lesaca, Fredmiranda
6 October 2011
  • Conclusion: I've had this lens for around 5 years now. It has been my workhorse lens for events including weddings. I really enjoy shooting with this lens cause it has an extremely high keeper rate. I used to have both the 24-105L and this lens. My idea back then was that I'd use this lens for work and the 24-105L for traveling.
  • Pros: Sharp, Great color rendition, perfect zoom range for a full frame, and expensive.
  • Cons: Heavy and bulky (but, the sharpness of this lens is like a prime. So, it's just like carrying around 3-4 primes in one lens.)
  • Read full review
Next page >>