Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
Showing 1-10 of 38
Great Optics, Poor Quality
BonViv, B&H Photo
27 October 2014
Excerpt: This lens is really fantastic in terms of optics. You'll probably only need one lens. I am a 'semi-pro' photographer (aka most of my photography is for work) and we used this lens for everything from product photos to 1080p video and it performs quite well.HOWEVER, after a mere 1.5 years of use, I...
Excerpt: When I first purchased the lens I was very happy. I had to adjust to some features and soon found out that my Tiffen variable ND filter did not work well with the wide angle, needless to say I was very upset because I do alot of photography on the water.
Conclusion: Lens is faster auto focus, overall good photo results. But went to faulty in less than 2 years - power diaphragm issue. While search the issue on website, found this is common issue with this lens for many years.
Excerpt: I replaced my 24-70L with this lens on a full frame 6D n order to get the slightly farther reach and less weight, sacrificing f2.8 fro f4 which I hoped iS would compensate. The lens is sharp and the IS works fine, but on a full frame sensor it has awful vignetting.
Excerpt: Amateur; arguably an enthusiast, but admittedly not the most educated. The lens doesn't perform as expected considering the investment. My Canon 10-22 noticeably outperforms. Not a recognizable step up from my kit (18-135 on a 50D).
Excerpt: I must have received a lemon but this lens combined with my 5Dii is completely unacceptable. Soft focus, "whites" tend to blead!, noticeable and random vignetting. This lens is [*]. This will be going back to be exchanged. If I see the same issues I will be returning my entire order.
Pros: Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Strong Construction