Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM
Showing 1-10 of 25
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Review
15 July 2013
Excerpt: The Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM lens is an inexpensive alternative to the 16-35mm f/2.8, but its edges are muddy at its widest angle. (3 out of 5) Pros Ultra-wide field of view Reasonable price tag Good center sharpness Cons Muddy edges and corners at 17mm Some distortion Noticeable color fringing The Canon EF 17-40mm
Pros: Ultra-wide field of view, Reasonable price tag, Good center sharpness
Cons: Muddy edges and corners at 17mm, Some distortion, Noticeable color fringing
Excerpt: Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM is one of Canon's professional grade lenses, first released in May of 2003. It is one of only four ultra wide zoom lenses Canon manufactures at this time. Sporting three aspherical lens elements and a Super UD glass element, the lens construction is made of 9 groups and 12 elements.
Conclusion: Are these two lens samples representative? I can't say for sure. I've been using my 16-35mm f/2.8L for many months and have been happy with the images it produces. Is it as sharp as primes in this focal length range? No, of course not. But it is very versatile, and I don't hesitate to use it in demanding situations.
Conclusion: If you shoot wide angle, full frame photographs with Canon cameras stopped down at f/8 and beyond, the EF 17-40mm f/4L lens is an outstanding lens. Contrast and sharpness are greatest at the wide end (20 and 24mm) of the zoom range and approach or exceed those of quality prime lenses. Sharpness drops off in far corners at 35mm and 40mm and microcontrast drops off slightly at 35mm.
Conclusion: It isn't lighter than the 16-35/2.8L. It isn't better quality than the 16-35/2.8L. It isn't dramatically wide on the small sensor cameras. However, if you want a high quality wide-angle zoom with a medium weight and a medium aperture, the 17-40/4L is an excellent value.
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM lens, (tested with cropped-frame APS-C body)
1 July 2007
Summary: The Canon EF 17-40mm may deliver spectacular ultra-wide angle coverage when fitted to a full-frame body like the EOS 5D, but offers a more normal, general-purpose range when mounted on cropped bodies like the EOS 30D or 400D / XTi. As such when evaluating it for cropped bodies, it’s important to compare it against other general purpose options like Canon’s standard kit lens and the popular EF-S 17-85mm.
Pros: Canon 'L' build and optical quality, Fast and quiet USM focusing motor, Constant f4 aperture throughout range, Will also work on full-frame body
Cons: Shorter zoom range than kit lens, No IS (although not particularly necessary), Overkill if not considering full-frame in future, Canon EF-S 17-85mm more flexible for most
Summary: Canon EF 17-40mm verdict
The EF 17-40mm f/4.0L is one of the best lenses in Canon’s range. It brings you a taste of the truly exotic with ultra-wide coverage, while boasting ‘L’ quality all at a surprisingly affordable price. Sure it ain’t exactly cheap, but it’s considerably more affordable than the EF 24-105mm f/4.0L and almost half the price of the
EF 16-35mm f/2.8L
Pros: Extreme wide angle coverage, Well-corrected at wider focal lengths, Fast and quiet USM focusing motor, An exotic but affordable 'L' lens
Cons: Zoom range too limited for general purpose, Soft corners at 40mm focused at infinity, Unimpressive macro capabilities, Light fall-off at wide angle (but expected)