Reviews, reviews, reviews...

8.2 out of 10

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM

To meet the growing demand of digital SLR owners, this ultra-wid Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM

Showing 1-2 of 2
Overall 2

User Review

Philipp Oscity, Fredmiranda
11 December 2007
  • Conclusion: I bought some days before the 16-35L II USM and im very unlucky with it. This Lens is less sharp than the 17-40 4.0L. See the Link to the picture. Did someone made the same experience ? What do you think about this compare ? Both images made at f4.0 ISO100 16mm/17mm EOS40d. I olmost send it to the Canon service, bud it came same bad back!! I think I go buy the 17-40 4.0L wich I olmost resaled.
  • Pros:
  • Cons: sharpness in the corners !!!!; price; focus ring bad accesable.
  • Read full review
Overall 2

User Review

Matahari, Fredmiranda
10 September 2003
  • Conclusion: I have now tried 3 different copies of this lens, and i have returned all 3 of them. The images are so soft, that they are not usable for my purposes. I have done the testing with a D60 and a 10D. I suspect that the results in the corners will be even worse on a fullframe-camera.
  • Pros: Well build. Good zoomrange.
  • Cons: Optical quality.
  • Read full review