Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
Showing 1-10 of 231
It works for my needs
Hartsimages, B&H Photo
8 December 2014
Excerpt: I normally have a need for a wide angle lens. I purchased it for real estate photography, often a subjects requires a wide angle lenses do to tight spaces.I'm very pleased with the image quality I'm getting from this lens.
Excerpt: Bought this to use with my C100. I don't use it as much in my still work unless I need a really wide, which is rare. I've owned a few versions of this lens over the years and this one seems to be the best so far.
Pros: Durable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight
Summary: This is a great wide angle lens. If you're looking at L glass you probably already know you're going to pay an arm and a leg but you also probably already know the quality as well. I bought this lens to go wider than my 24-70 and man does this do a great job!
Excerpt: Canon Wide Angle landscape quest. I have the 14 Rockinon, 21 Zeiss, 24 TSE, 24-70 Canon, and more. All very different. I ordered 2 of the 16-35s to test. Copy 1 decentered on left side. This lens renders like the 24-70 more than any other.
Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Rugged
Excerpt: So far I've tested the lens by shooting some landscape work and shooting indoors; both in varying conditions. Background: I'm shooting with a 7D and I'm a serious amateur. Other L series lenses owned is the 135mm f 2.o. This lens is really wide!
Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Low light performance, Rugged, Strong Construction