Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
Showing 1-10 of 500
Way too soft
Crash, B&H Photo
4 weeks ago
Excerpt: This lens is softer toward the edges than the version 1 that I had, but reportedly within specs. As I get more clients wanting finished pieces over 5', the softness of this lens is hurting my business.
Excerpt: The quality of the lens is above what I expected. I have a Canon 24-105 lens that came with my Mark III and while I love this lens when I took a test photo with the 16-35 against the 24-105 the 16-35 was sooo much crisper.
Pros: Consistent Output, Durable, Easily Interchangeable, Fast / accurate auto-focus, Lightweight, Nice Bokeh, Rugged, Strong Construction
Excerpt: Hey All Always I used to go with my Great Combo 5dm3 with 70-200 ii which is always giving me the "WOW" pictures. But for long time I was not happy with wide angle focal length with 24-105/24-70 2.8 ii/16-35 2.8 Then later I bought this lens after seeing the paper configuration and it blows me away...