www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-ef-100-300mm-f-4-5-5-6-usm.299248
7.6 out of 10

Canon EF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM

Highly practical and portable telephoto zoom lens. The five zoom Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon EF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM

Showing 1-6 of 6
Overall 4
4.0

Not for me

L. Jones "angsax", Amazon
11 February 2009
  • Summary: This is not a lens for anyone shooting events indoors. It MAY be great for those of you who don't mind using flash, but I really try not to (preference here). So, others like it and keep in mind the type of photography you do and take it for a test drive - returned.
  • Read full review
Overall 3
3.0

User Review

stevej2001, Fredmiranda
4 December 2008
  • Conclusion: I bought this lens about 1990 for my Eos 650. It was ok given that I had very limited skills. When I bought the original Digital Rebel (300D) I figured I could use this lens-- boy was I disappointed. The image quality was dismal. So I bought an 70-200L4. What an eyeopener. Of course the L lens is much more expensive, but the difference between the two was incredible. I will say the lens is pretty robust-- much better constructed than newer canon inexpensive lenses.
  • Pros: Inexpensive
  • Cons: Soft, especially at the long end.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

eyes, Fredmiranda
12 September 2004
  • Conclusion: I gave it a fair ratig because it doesn't do much other than provide me with 300mm. I will upgrade from it for sure. In well lit situations, it works well. I have taken some decent Little League photos with it.
  • Pros: focal length. price.
  • Cons: lens slide. soft images. you pay for what you get.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

moallen, Fredmiranda
23 July 2003
  • Conclusion: I bought this lens to shoot softball games, so I was frequently using the lens at 200-300 to get closer to the action on the field. Shooting action late in the day, I had my 10D set to ISO 800 and 1600 to get reasonable shutter speeds. The lens was wide open, unfortunately. I kept the camera on a tripod to eliminate shaking. Results were disappointing -- very soft. I had to apply aggressive sharpening to rescue the images.
  • Pros: Light weight, convenient size, USM autofocus is fast and silent, nice feeling to zoom action. 58mm filter size is nice.
  • Cons: Disappointing lack of sharpness -- poor at 200 or greater.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

Андрей Тверской, club.foto.ru
9 March 2007
  • Excerpt: Покупал в основном для стрельбы по птичкам. После нескольких попыток отказался от этой идеи. ХА просто убивают весь кадр. Использовал с 50d. Пробовал съемку и в других условиях: съемка батальных сцен на реконструкции в Бородино. Картинка не порадовала-не достаточно четкое изображение, темный. Лежит мертвым грузом. Выброшенные деньги.
  • Pros: Цена.
  • Cons: ХА, темный
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 4
4.0

inutilisable

ikiu, Ciao
12 March 2005
  • Summary: Acheté avec mon eos 100 pour epauler mon 28-105, cet objectif a vite montré ces limites. Premiere chose il etait assez encombrant, longueur : 12.2 cm, diamètre : 7.4 cm, poids : 540 g. Sa distance focale etait de 100 mm - 300 mm pour une ouverture de l'objectif : F/4.5-5.6. Sa portée mini de mise au point est de 1.5 m L'objectif est composé de 10 groupes / 13 éléments, la taille du filtre est de 58 mm, Il est composé de 8 lames de diaphragme, et le montage est du type...
  • Pros: focale ??
  • Cons: ouverture, qualité d'image
  • Read full review Translate to English