Reviews and Problems with Acer Aspire Timeline Ultra M3-series
Showing 1-10 of 80
Battery performance 9
Gaming performance 7
Review Acer Aspire M3-481 Ultrabook
14 March 2013
Summary: Stylish marathon runner. Acer has an ultra-thin 14-inch notebook with a Core i5 ULV chip on offer with the M3-481. The Computer is available from just 480 Euros (~$622) without operating system, and also looks nice. Our review reveals whether or not Acer has built a recommendable notebook with this model.
Pros: Very good battery life, Cheap price, Good running performance, Runs almost silently, Low Volume, Good quality built, Extremely good battery life, good performance, and the appealing case.
Cons: Low-contrast screen, No openings for maintenance
Summary: Evolutionary. Acer takes a new approach to the familiar Ultrabook: a laptop with a touchscreen, optical drive and gaming-ready GPU. How will their "all-around device" fare in our tests?
Pros: Long battery life, High program performance, Fast graphics card, Optical drive, Touchscreen, Looking for a gaming-ready Ultrabook? Few competitors offer higher performance than the Acer Aspire M3.
Cons: Single USB 3.0, Disappointing TN panel, High temperature emissions at full load, Constantly running cooler fan, Workmanship flaws on our test model, A better display, clean workmanship, reliable input devices – for 1,000 Euros it is hard not to expect more.
Summary: In case of the Acer Aspire M3 Touch ultrabook, we recommend that unless touch is an absolute necessity for you, you should choose one of the more conventional ultrabooks around the Rs. 60,000 mark, which will offer better overall performance. The HP Spectre XT makes the most sense around this budget.
Excerpt: Who said ultrabooks had to be small? Certainly not Acer with its new 15.6in Aspire Timeline Ultra M3-581TG-72634G52Mnkk â€“ a laptop that promises ultrabook portability and responsiveness with the raw power needed for tasks like intensive gaming. But while it’s a success overall there are some issues. On paper the M3 is definitely an ultrabook — and it physically feels like one.
Pros: Good battery life powerful and portable good input devices.
Summary: Priced at Rs 51,705, the Timeline U M3-581TG is one of the cheapest options you have if you wish to buy an Ultrabook. Of course, it isn’t cheap by any means, considering you can buy a more powerful laptop for the same price. This means the premium is mainly for the ultra-slim design. The M3-581TG would have been a better deal had it featured the Intel Core i5-3317U processor and at least a 750GB hard drive.
Excerpt: WHEN LOOKING FOR a tagline that will easily sell a boatload of Acer Timeline M3 notebooks, it doesn’t take much more than: “an ultrabook that will play Battlefield 3 on Ultra setting.” And it’s true, too. The Timeline M3 will indeed play BF3 on Ultra, provided you’re comfortable with 30 frames per second. That dips a bit below our thresholds for a shooter. We preferred playing Battlefield 3 on High, which gave us 50–60fps in online play.
Pros: Powerful graphics in a thin package; loaded.
Cons: Mediocre panel; width pushes the boundaries of ultrabook portability.
Acer Aspire Timeline Ultra M3 Review – The First True Ultrabook?
14 May 2012
Excerpt: Acer’s new Aspire Timeline Ultra M3 is the first ultrabook to hit the US with discrete graphics on board. Acer and NVIDIA tout it as the first “true ultrabook” thanks to the power under the hood. But with a 15.6-inch display, will most consumers really place it in that category? The screen size coupled with the inclusion of an optical drive means that most will compare this laptop with other mainstream machines.
Pros: Speedy, Great graphics performance, Slim and lightweight for a 15-inch machine, Long battery life
Cons: Sub-par touchpad, Display resolution only 1366 x 768, Ports in an awkward place
Acer Aspire Timeline Ultra M3 Review: First Impressions
20 April 2012
Excerpt: The Acer Aspire Timeline Ultra M3 has the distinction of having the longest laptop name ever and of being the first ultrabook to come to market with discrete graphics. Okay, maybe the name isn’t the longest ever, but the discrete graphics thing is no joke. Intel’s integrated graphics are good enough for mainstream tasks and usage, but for intense tasks and power users, they don’t quite cut it.