Reviews and Problems with Western Digital WD10JFCX
Showing 1-10 of 151
Good for near-enterprise multi-disk setups
2 weeks ago
Summary: I've taken to using these over the 3.5" disks lately because I can fit so many in a regular 4U rackmount chassis. I'm sure they're not as fast as their 3.5" 7200RPM cousins with lots of cache, but most people buying these will be tying a bunch together anyway.
Have a SFF NAS need.. This is a great choice. in the 1TB size.
30 May 2015
Summary: Fast shipping .. Better price then other retailers. Better wainty then and standard 2.5 Hdd 5400rpm. I have 6 in ZRAID6 with a Hot spare. only wish WD would have the red in a 16mm 2TB size. they are very quite and run way cooler then the 10k SAS drives they replaced. yes then are slower.
WD Red WD10JFCX IntelliPower Sata 6.0, 2.5" NAS HD
Maria N., Newegg
23 May 2015
Summary: If I could make this assessment with NO EGGS, I'd do it. Since I'm past the 30 day limit, I must now deal with WD. I'd just like a replacement 'cuz I don't like to give up and what should be a good thing.
Cons: Installed in computer, tried to format, showed quick format , I accepted. While trying to use showed disk errors, corrected by Windows. Went back to format, immediately went quick format, back using, more errors, back to format, this time I forced full format. For a 1 TB HD drive it took little t...
I love the extra warranty on the Red series of drives
21 May 2015
Summary: Purchased this for use as a secondary storage drive in an Intel NUC (primary drive is SSD). It fit perfectly, and was painless to install. I love the extra warranty on the Red series of drives.