www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Seagate-2tb-barracuda-xt.6976172
6.3 out of 10

Seagate 2TB Barracuda XT

Seagate 2TB Barracuda XT The Seagate Barracuda XT is a 7200 Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Seagate 2TB Barracuda XT

Showing 1-4 of 4
Overall 8
8.0

Seagate Barracuda XT 2TB

maximum pc
11 January 2010
  • Excerpt: When Seagate told us it would be shipping the first 6Gb/s SATA hard drive, we were a little surprised. And when we found out it wasn’t going to be a solid state drive, but a 7,200rpm Barracuda drive, our skepticism increased. Sure, we’d been waiting a long time for Seagate’s 2TB 7,200rpm drive, and it’s nice to see the SATA 6Gb/s spec ship on a real-world product, but putting a 6Gb/s controller on a mechanical hard drive is like putting a Formula 1 airfoil on a golf...
  • Pros: 100MB/s-plus reads and writes; props for early adoption of 6GB/s SATA.
  • Cons: Performs better on 3Gb/s SATA; can't match WD Caviar Black; 6Gb/s SATA is unnecessary.
  • Read full review

Seagate Barracuda XT 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review

Hardware Secrets
19 November 2009
  • Summary: We were expecting Seagate Barracuda XT 2 TB to smash its main competitor, Western Digital Caviar Black 2 TB, because of the use of the new SATA-600 interface, but this didn’t happen: both achieved the same performance level. In fact, Western Digital Caviar Black 2 TB achieved a somewhat lower access time; so if you are looking for a fast 2 TB hard drive, Western Digital Caviar Black 2 TB has a little bit of an advantage.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Seagate Barracuda XT 2TB review

expertreviews.co.uk
19 December 2009
  • Excerpt: Seagate's 2TB Barracuda XT is the first internal hard disk we've seen to use the new SATA 600 interface. On paper, it can transfer files at a top speed of 600MB/s, which is twice as fast as the existing SATA 300 interface. We didn't expect the Barracuda XT to come anywhere near its theoretical top speed in our file- transfer tests, but we were still surprised that it was no faster than the quickest SATA 300 disks.
  • Read full review

Expert Review

eReviews.dk
17 December 2009