www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sapphire-flex-hd6450-1gb-ddr3.33516609
9.1 out of 10

Sapphire FLEX HD6450 1GB DDR3

Great Deal: $39.99

Reviews and Problems with Sapphire FLEX HD6450 1GB DDR3

Showing 1-10 of 13
Overall 6
5.6
Value for money 8
8.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

Insipid but cheap

blair, TigerDirect.com
19 March 2013
  • Summary: Only pros are that it was cheap and it is silent (no fan). Otherwise, insipid performance.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 6
6.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 6
6.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

4.7 on the windows 7 rating?

772, TigerDirect.com
27 May 2012
  • Summary: I have older ATI 5000's cards that get 5.9 on the windows 7 rating. Most SATA HD's will only get a 5.9 on the windows 7 ratings. Which means you most likely got a 5.9 bottleneck. Any thing under that is not acceptable to me. However, most software is good at a 4 rating. 4.7 WHAT???
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 10
10
Features 6
6.0
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

For video processing ONLY

RestoredSt, TigerDirect.com
8 February 2012
  • Summary: This is a workstation card. There's no point in it running DirectX11, since it barely handles DirectX9, and completely forget about OpenGL. 8fps on Furmark is abysmal. Videos, however, are amazing in their clarity. Am RMAing this card as it is not what I intended it to be. Packaging advertises this as a gaming card... which it certainly is not. Onboard video did much better.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

It's not amazing, but it's not bad

Mark A. Lightell, Amazon
26 November 2011
  • Summary: I bought this graphics card because I needed a better card to play sid meiers civilization 5. This card's got about 3-4 times the power of my old card, so it got the job done. Unfortunately, I have to play civ 5 on the lowest graphics settings which is moderately disappointing. I wasn't expecting to play with the graphics maxed out, but I was hoping for better than rock bottom graphics settings.
  • Read full review
Overall 5
4.6
Value for money 4
4.0
Features 4
4.0
Performance 4
4.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

Don't waste your money

Caradoc, TigerDirect.com
12 July 2011
  • Summary: I bought this as a temporary video solution so I could get my Asus P6X58D-E tested and running. From a performance standpoint this card is worthless however if you are running a business only desktop then this will be fine I wish I had payed the 20 bucks more for a more useable card. If you already have integrated video then this probably isn't worth the money.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

OK for the money

John, Amazon
14 December 2011
  • Summary: First off this card is cheap, that means it's a compromise. There is just no such a thing in this computing world (or elsewhere for that matter) as something for nothing. The reviewer claiming flawless 1080P playback must have been using a very different card to mine. There is considerable motion judder and blur on a 1080P stream, I use a 2ms ASUS LCD monitor so some of it is probably down to the monitor also but the most of it from the card.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Gaming Performance Test

Jonas Schneller, Amazon
16 November 2013
  • Summary: Hi, bestimmt fragen sich viele von euch, was diese Grafikkarte mit 3D-Games anfangen kann - Und vorweg: Es ist keine geeignete Grafiklösung dafür. Ich habe mir diese Grafikkarte vor ca. 2 Jahren gekauft, jedoch die Version mit 512MB GDDR5 VRAM. Ich spielte auf meinem PC mit folgenden Hardware-Komponenten: IntelCore i3-2100 @2x3,1GHz / Asus P8 H61-M Motherboard / 4GB DDR3 RAM 1600MHz.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 6
6.0

Harte Kritik: Sapphire Radeon HD6450

steveestonee, Amazon
11 September 2013
  • Summary: Sapphire Radeon HD6450 fuktioniert soweit ganz gut. Nach einem Test stellte sich aber heraus dass eine flotter Sapphire HD5450 nur knapp 5% schlechter ist als die HD6450. Die mehr Hitze-und Stromverschwendung kann man sich getrost sparen. Die Leistung der HD6450 ist ca. auf dem Niveau einer in den z.B. moderen intel CPU (G2020) integrierten Grafikeinheit. Wenn man bedenkt dass dieser CPU um die 50€ kostet..
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 6
6.0

Getauscht gegen HD5450

bluebravo.de "Calimero", Amazon
9 December 2012
  • Summary: Das Bild ist super aber Stromverbrauch und wärmeentwicklung passen einfach nicht zu einem HTPC, darum habe ich sie zurückgeschickt und gegen eine HD-5450 getauscht die weniger Strom verbraucht und zumindest etwas kühler bleibt! Das Bild hat sich dabei nicht verschlechtert!
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 6
6.0

Carte fanless

P. Pascal, Amazon
22 October 2012
  • Summary: cette carte est aujourd'hui dépassée pour les jeux, c'est clair. Je l'ai choisie parce qu'elle n'a pas de ventilo, et pour moi le silence est prioritaire. Pour la bureautique, ça va bien en 1920x1080.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>