www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Sapphire-flex-hd6450-1gb-ddr3.33516609
9.1 out of 10

Sapphire FLEX HD6450 1GB DDR3

Great Deal: $38.00

Reviews and Problems with Sapphire FLEX HD6450 1GB DDR3

Showing 1-10 of 13
Overall 6
6.0

User Review

samsonite, NCIX.com
10 September 2013
  • Summary: I needed a very basic card, only because my motherboard did not have a video output port built-in. So I grabbed one of these. I'm not a gamer and I don't edit videos, so I wasn't going to pay hundreds for a wicked graphics card. My basic requirement was (1) play Youtube videos; (2) watch an occasional movie. That's all. Now this card DOES do that but it lags slightly when it comes to very high HD quality Youtube videos.
  • Pros: Nice and cheap.
  • Cons: This is a budget card for a budget build. Don't expect amazing results.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Nice item; shady tactics

Allen L., Newegg
30 April 2013
  • Pros: Quiet card, runs smoothly and efficiently, Nice upgrade from my dead Radeon X1650 pro that did its job for over 5 years. I recommend this solution for builders with basic, low-budget needs. Blu-ray performance greatly improved. Bonus: HDMI slot. 5 eggs here.
  • Cons: Questionable newegg and sapphire business practices. video card was sent in a brown, non-retail box w/o the UPC barcode required for the rebate. I believe this is done on purpose. Neither side wants to take responsibility so I have to eat it through RMA? Probably means paying for shipping while my desktop remains out of commission throughout the process? 1 egg here.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
5.6
Value for money 8
8.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

Insipid but cheap

blair, TigerDirect.com
19 March 2013
  • Summary: Only pros are that it was cheap and it is silent (no fan). Otherwise, insipid performance.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 6
6.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 6
6.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

4.7 on the windows 7 rating?

772, TigerDirect.com
27 May 2012
  • Summary: I have older ATI 5000's cards that get 5.9 on the windows 7 rating. Most SATA HD's will only get a 5.9 on the windows 7 ratings. Which means you most likely got a 5.9 bottleneck. Any thing under that is not acceptable to me. However, most software is good at a 4 rating. 4.7 WHAT???
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 10
10
Features 6
6.0
Performance 2
2.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

For video processing ONLY

RestoredSt, TigerDirect.com
8 February 2012
  • Summary: This is a workstation card. There's no point in it running DirectX11, since it barely handles DirectX9, and completely forget about OpenGL. 8fps on Furmark is abysmal. Videos, however, are amazing in their clarity. Am RMAing this card as it is not what I intended it to be. Packaging advertises this as a gaming card... which it certainly is not. Onboard video did much better.
  • Read full review
Overall 5
4.6
Value for money 4
4.0
Features 4
4.0
Performance 4
4.0
Overall quality 6
6.0

Don't waste your money

Caradoc, TigerDirect.com
12 July 2011
  • Summary: I bought this as a temporary video solution so I could get my Asus P6X58D-E tested and running. From a performance standpoint this card is worthless however if you are running a business only desktop then this will be fine I wish I had payed the 20 bucks more for a more useable card. If you already have integrated video then this probably isn't worth the money.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

OK for the money

John, Amazon
14 December 2011
  • Summary: First off this card is cheap, that means it's a compromise. There is just no such a thing in this computing world (or elsewhere for that matter) as something for nothing. The reviewer claiming flawless 1080P playback must have been using a very different card to mine. There is considerable motion judder and blur on a 1080P stream, I use a 2ms ASUS LCD monitor so some of it is probably down to the monitor also but the most of it from the card.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Harte Kritik: Sapphire Radeon HD6450

steveestonee, Amazon
11 September 2013
  • Summary: Sapphire Radeon HD6450 fuktioniert soweit ganz gut. Nach einem Test stellte sich aber heraus dass eine flotter Sapphire HD5450 nur knapp 5% schlechter ist als die HD6450. Die mehr Hitze-und Stromverschwendung kann man sich getrost sparen. Die Leistung der HD6450 ist ca. auf dem Niveau einer in den z.B. moderen intel CPU (G2020) integrierten Grafikeinheit. Wenn man bedenkt dass dieser CPU um die 50€ kostet..
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 6
6.0

Getauscht gegen HD5450

bluebravo.de "Calimero", Amazon
9 December 2012
  • Summary: Das Bild ist super aber Stromverbrauch und wärmeentwicklung passen einfach nicht zu einem HTPC, darum habe ich sie zurückgeschickt und gegen eine HD-5450 getauscht die weniger Strom verbraucht und zumindest etwas kühler bleibt! Das Bild hat sich dabei nicht verschlechtert!
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 6
6.0

Carte fanless

P. Pascal, Amazon
18 November 2012
  • Summary: cette carte est aujourd'hui dépassée pour les jeux, c'est clair. Je l'ai choisie parce qu'elle n'a pas de ventilo, et pour moi le silence est prioritaire. Pour la bureautique, ça va bien en 1920x1080.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>