Summary: If your expecting to get what the picture shows or what the description says you won't. This is a DVI-D card NOT a DVI-I card. If this port is why you're buying this card look elsewhere. I never got to use the card so I can't say about quality or performance.
Summary: Although this is a pretty decent stand alone video card for the money, it does not work well with AMD Dual Graphics. This is NOT the fault of AMD or Walmart...it is simply on the shoulders of AMD.
Summary: .. and that is pretty much all I got. The only good aspects are it's price and that fact that it doesn't have a fan which will break after a year on the road. It is hardly better than an integrated HD4250. Don't buy it unless you have an integrated video card which is giving you problems..
Summary: My Win7 Experience is all 7.9, 32GB 1866 memory, FX 6 core at 4.2GHZ, Asus M5A97 MOBO, but this card can only get 4.2 and 4.5 for business / graphics performance. And that's even after installing the turbo drivers. Don't waste your money. The 2GB of ram makes no difference at all for anything.
Not worth the price, but I managed to make it work.
8 June 2013
Summary: I bought this as an upgrade for a Radeon HD 4250. The blade contacts on the smaller, forward set were physically too wide and required excessive force to install. as a result, the card does not seat properly.
Summary: Fonctionnement correct avec l'écran de l'ordinateur. Par contre sur le téléviseur Philips relié par la prise HDMI, l'image est très correcte pendant un temps variable ( de quelques secondes à une demi-heure...