www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Dummy.190587
5.8 out of 10

ATI Radeon VE

Radeon™ VE a.k.a Radeon 7000 DUAL DISPLAY EDITION offers excelle Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with ATI Radeon VE

Showing 1-6 of 6
Overall 6
6.0

ATI Radeon VE Video Card Video Review

3dGameMan.com
11 June 2002

ATI Radeon VE Review

Neoseeker
11 February 2002

ATI RADEON VE Review

X-bit labs
20 April 2001
  • Summary: This review is devoted to the main competitor of Matrox G450 - ATI RADEON VE graphics card. It can't boast super fast 3Dperformance, however it is positioned as a good business solution with dual-display support (HydraVision technologyfrom Appian).
  • Read full review

ATI Radeon VE 32MB

AnandTech
19 February 2001
  • Conclusion: For this section we will have to ask you to wait until tomorrow, where we will feature an article investigating driver performance of various cards in Windows98 as well as Windows 2000. We will investigate how the Radeon drivers perform in a variety of situations in Windows 2000 and also see how these drivers compare with their NVIDIA counterparts. Be sure to check back with us tomorrow.
  • Read full review

ATI Radeon VE

Au-Ja!
18 January 2002
  • Conclusion: ATI Radeon VE 32MB - 3/3 Die Benchmarks Folgendes Setup stand für die Benchmarks zur Verfügung: Windows 2000 SP2, Epox 8KTA+, 1GHz AMD Thunderbird-B, 2x 128MB PC133 3-3-3, Soundblaster 128, VIA 4in1 4.29 und ATI '3224' Beta-Treiber. Zum Vergleich dienen die gleichteure Pixelview GeForce 2MX 64MB und die ATI Radeon 64MB ViVo. Quake III Arena dient als OpenGL Test. Die Radeon VE hat keine Chance gegen die GeForce 2MX oder gar die Radeon 64 ViVo.
  • Read full review Translate to English

ATI Radeon VE

CNET
22 May 2001
  • Excerpt: Avec la Radeon VE, ATI s'attaque au marché plus que florissant des cartes 3D de moyenne gamme. Néanmoins, Radeon VE doit être cantonnée à une utilisation multimédia. Sans le Charisma Engine (l'équivalent du T&L de nVidia) et avec un pipeline 3D en moins, ses performances 3D sont quelque peu en retrait puisque la puissance de rendu (fill rate) descend à 183 Mpixel/s. Testée sur un Athlon 1,33 GHz avec 256 Mo de mémoire DDR, elle a obtenu une note de 3527 au 3Dmark 2000.
  • Read full review Translate to English