www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Garmin Forerunner 405CX
5.7 out of 10

Garmin Forerunner 405CX

Forerunner 405CX The Forerunner 405CX is the latest in Garm Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Garmin Forerunner 405CX

Showing 1-10 of 17
Overall 4
4.0
Value for money 4
4.0

User Review

auby2, Walmart
14 October 2013
  • Summary: this band may be ok for a female, but not for a male. Small usb didn't even download on computer for test run. USB was lot smaller than the one in the photo.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0
Value for money 8
8.0

User Review

rasby, Walmart
17 August 2013
  • Summary: I owned the watch for less than a month and it keeps freezing towards the end of my runs. Stay away from this watch. I'm planning on returning the watch.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 6
6.0

User Review

mailbagman, Walmart
30 May 2013
  • Summary: It is little hard moving from screen to screen. The bezel to do that is hard to control. But for the money I paid for it I guess I did ok.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0
Value for money 4
4.0

User Review

ColoradoRunner1974, Walmart
17 March 2013
  • Summary: I wish I could say that I have had an overwhelmingly positive experience with Garmin products, but this has not been the case. I have a Forerunner 405 which worked well when it worked but had to be replaced 3 times in just over a year.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Comparing it with Garmin Watches and TIMEX

John Smith, Amazon
5 January 2012
  • Summary: I compare TIMEX GLOBAL TRAINER, GARMIN FORERUNNER 305 and GARMIN FORERUNNER 405CX. TIMEX GLOBAL TRAINER GOOD: 1. It is good for triathlon (the other two watches are not because they are not water resistant so that you can swim with them.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

An Unfortunate Purchase

Strick, Amazon
18 November 2011
  • Summary: I've had this GPS watch since it was a Gold Box offer in early June. When it works, it does what it promises. Unfortunately, far too frequently it doesn't do what I expect and I wind up frustrated yet again that I spent so much money on it. The primary problem.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

For a HRM to count calories, get a Polar. If you want GPS, get Garmin.

nymo01, Ebay
7 June 2011
  • Summary: Few things I'm disappointed about. 1. the heart rate monitor is NOT compatible with the cardio equipment at my gym. We have Lifestyle treadmills and bikes, Cybex ArcTrainers, and Procor ellipticals. Pretty basic and none of these machines read heart rate. 2. AND THIS IS MY BIGGEST COMPLAINT!
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Comparison to the Forerunner 305

Ben Anders, Amazon
26 December 2010
  • Summary: I bought this to replace my old Garmin Forerunner 305. I thought it would be a lot better, but it is actually mainly worse. First, it does not do multi-sport like the 305 can. What this means is that you will not have accurate data for a triathlon. The watch will always think you are running.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

The touch bezel, not such a great idea

pbgeezer, Amazon
19 November 2010
  • Summary: I replaced a 305 that served me reliably for four years, then mysteriously just quit. At the time I considered simply buying a replacement 305, but I figured Garmin must have something much better out by now, so I bought a 405CX.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Big disappointment

Eli D. Skulsky, Amazon
29 October 2010
  • Summary: First, the positive: I am quite pleased with the GPS performance of this watch and with and the computer interface (the ANT+ stick and agent). The watch reliably connects with my computer when it's within range, downloads the data to the computer, and the software automatically uploads the data to...
  • Read full review
Next page >>