www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Callaway X-Tour Wedge
7.3 out of 10

Callaway X-Tour Wedge

Callaway X-Tour Wedge The Callaway X-Tour Wedge is designe Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Callaway X-Tour Wedge

Showing 1-10 of 12
Overall 6
6.0

X-tour wedge

curtisk3, Ebay
16 July 2008
  • Summary: This club is okay. Gives you good bite on the green and is pleasing to the eye, but is shorter than other clubs. This club is the same length as my Cleveland 60 degree wedge.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 6
6.0

Shoots in the 90s

Makineagles, GolfReview.com
13 March 2008
  • Summary: Was looking to replace my aging Titleist DCI 990 irons, so after reading good reviews, I gave the X-tours a try. I was really not impressed. I can get used to the thick top-line, but the sole width was too much. They are straight, but a club shorter than the DCI 990s.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 6
6.0

Shoots in the 90s

Clay Clanton, GolfReview.com
12 March 2008
  • Summary: They seem to be okay clubs, but I took them out of the bag and went back to my Titleist DCI 990 irons. The sole is too thick for me. I would think anyone from a scratch handicap up to +10 would not like these irons. I am going to try a set of Taylormade R7TPs.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 6
6.0

Shoots in the 70s

UncleKirk, GolfReview.com
27 July 2007
  • Summary: This is a compromise club. A compromise between a true player's club and a game improvement cavity back. You don't get the best of both worlds, but you get something in the middle. The heads are small length-wise, but fat both on top and the sole.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 2
2.0

Shoots in the 70s

Geeza_1, GolfReview.com
19 October 2006
  • Summary: I have to agree with the previous poster. All I could hit with these irons were high spinning, balooning shots as well. Also tried a reshaft and that didn't help. The feel was also pretty average at best and the thick sole was not to my liking.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 6
6.0

Scratch Golfer

golferal, GolfReview.com
7 May 2006
  • Summary: These wedges are very heavy, spin the ball quite a bit, but their biggest drawback is that they TEAR the ball like no other wedge I've ever hit. Even hitting short chips and pitches (
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 6
6.0

Shoots in the 80s

Rob Gooding, GolfReview.com
30 April 2006
  • Summary: Purchased these to replace Mx20's. Dead feel off club face, and lost at least a club to the Mizunos. Very heavy in comparison. Very disappointed. Went back to Mizunos. Could not get over the massive loss of distance.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 4
4.0

Shoots in the 70s

pcrage, GolfReview.com
20 April 2006
  • Summary: I bought these early this year and hit a lot of balls on the practice tee and played with them 5 or 6 times. I was expecting much more than I expereinced. In my experience, the ball came off the face nicely but with very little feed back for a forged iron.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 8
8.0

Shoots in the 80s

tommiegunn, GolfReview.com
26 March 2006
  • Summary: Beautiful irons! Great looks, great feel, gots lots of attentions from other golfers, but not my cup of tea. I read somewhere in here someone said these are very forgiving irons...yea Right! Yes they are forgiving, yes, but not very. It'll let you know and punish you if you get a miss hit.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Value for money 4
4.0

Shoots in the 70s

Jerger, GolfReview.com
24 March 2006
  • Summary: Loved them at first, then was glad to get rid of them. Easily the straightest and most forgiving club with a similar profile(no offset) i have ever owned. I was playing in 20 deg weather and happy. But soon i noticed something very disturbing. I would hit my drive 20 yrds past every one in my group.
  • Read full review
Next page >>