www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Whirlpool EV201NZTQ
6.2 out of 10

Whirlpool EV201NZTQ

This Energy Star® qualified 20.1 cu. ft. frost-free upright frea Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Whirlpool EV201NZTQ

Showing 1-5 of 5
Overall 2
2.0

Bad seal

Stormwatcher, Amazon
20 July 2013
  • Summary: I purchased this model through Sears in January 2011. After the delivery, I noticed there was a gap in the top of the freezer - it wasn't sealing correctly. So I called for a repair under warranty, and they replaced the gasket. It seemed ok for a few weeks, and then the same thing happened.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Whirlpool energy star freezer

radthc, AJ Madison
22 May 2013
  • Summary: High points: Very energy efficient. Very even temperature distribution throughout freezer. Low points: Less space efficient than my older Frigidaire freezer of similar rated capacity. Holds only 80% as much food. The door do not reopen for about 2 minutes, after it is shut.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Fantastic

Rosy, AJ Madison
4 April 2012
  • Summary: Great product. However, I did not receive the wheels that go on the front of the freezer and I would like to have them. Thank you.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Non Op

IslandTransfer, Amazon
13 January 2012
  • Summary: Showed up, didn't work, Abt Electronics policy of 100% satisfaction is false, now all these months later, the guy shows up to fix it and can't. I will never buy an appliance online ever again.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0
Design 8
8.0
Value for money 4
4.0
Features 8
8.0
Ease of use 8
8.0
Overall quality 2
2.0

Whirlpool upright freezer EVL202NXTN 20.1 CU FT

VERN, reviews.lowes.com
8 January 2012
  • Summary: I purchased this in Sept 2009 with an additional 2 year warranty. It worked fine with no problems until Dec 2011, We had 4 service calls in Dec before it was declared unrepairable. Lowe's settlement dept has promised to mail me a check which is very fair .
  • Pros: service was pro
  • Cons: Low quality
  • Read full review