www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Oliver-twist.34041580
7.7 out of 10

Oliver Twist

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Oliver Twist

Showing 1-10 of 32
Overall 9
9.0

Brilliant

hirr4, IMDb
8 June 2008
  • Summary: I thought that a coloured Nancy was actually more realistic than a white Nancy as it shows the depravity that was associated with ethnic minorities in those days. In the book, I thought it was strange that Nancy was so uprighteously good but in the film she's got a 'fallen angel' thing going on which I love. Bill Sikes was played FANTASTICALLY!
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

A Joy to Watch

foxgloveyoukai, IMDb
25 April 2008
  • Summary: A wonderful and very modern retelling of a classic story. Quirky and charming in equal measures, this particular take on Oliver Twist is a worthy watch indeed, and even riveting at times. If you happen to come across a copy in your local video shop, I will personally vouch for this title as money well spent.
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

Very well done!

toxina90, IMDb
21 December 2007
  • Summary: Yes I understand this had a mixed bag of a reception. However, speaking as someone who hasn't read the book, I have an open mind towards this adaptation. I can say I was looking forward to it - having loved the BBC's amazing 'Bleak House'. Overall I think the story is well executed and Dicken's literature is treated with respect - but some people have pointed out differences from the book - which is a shame - yet I feel as a whole they didn't damage this too much.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

David Lean's Superb Dickens

John Bale, IMDb
30 June 2007
  • Summary: Still the most Dickensian of all the Oliver Twist films David Lean's inspired version, never the less is much indebted in its style to the German Expressionist Cinema. It's London is more related to Fritz Lang than Victorian England but the spirit of Dickens is alive and well in the accurately drawn caricatures from the novel. Outstanding performances by Francis J. Sullivan as ridiculous Mr.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Absolutely marvelous!

farwesternsky, IMDb
13 June 2006
  • Summary: I am a huge Dickens fan. I have read Oliver Twist, and have even written college papers on the novel. This movie is by far the best version of Oliver Twist ever made (this includes David Lean's movie, the Polanski version, and the musical). The casting is superb; Robert Lindsay (Fagin) is one of the best character actors I have ever seen, Michael Kitchen plays Mr.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

An incredible version of a Dickens classic.

Eric Endres, IMDb
10 May 2006
  • Summary: Some have taken Alan Beasdale to task for rewriting some aspects of the original Dickens story, but I think it was all for the best. It may not match the original story, but taken completely on its own it is nonetheless very compelling and captures the essence of the original well enough while adding some nice new elements. This is a top notch production in every respect... writing, direction, acting, music, sets, costumes, etc.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Tribute to Dickens by Polanskii

kmukh_73, IMDb
15 February 2006
  • Summary: Awesome movie. I am sure, people of all ages enjoyed the movie. Brilliant direction (well, it's Polanski, so there will be no mess), cinematography, acting and film-editing. But to me, the surprise was Ben Kingsley as Fagin. Man, what a stellar role he played in the movie. I can't forget it. He definitely should have been nominated for Osacr in Best Supporting actor role.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

An excellent movie

rmanory, IMDb
24 January 2006
  • Summary: Oliver Twist in Roman Polanski's version has many similarities with the earlier Oliver! version, despite to fact that more than 20 years have passed between these versions. Even the actors who play Fagin and Skyse look the same. I think however that this movie is even better, because, since it's not a musical, the plot does not stop for songs and it flows more smoothly. Moreover, this movie of course also follows the book more closely. Why did I find it to be excellent?
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

The Best Film Version of Dickens' Second Novel

theowinthrop, IMDb
15 January 2006
  • Summary: In 1835 London began reading a series of comic essays or sketches by an unknown writer - it turned out a Parliamentary reporter. He wrote these pieces in a book illustrated by Hablot Browne, who drew pictures under the nickname "Phiz". The writer of the pieces decided to supply them to the public as SKETCHES BY BOZ, to complement his illustrator. The writer was actually named Charles John Huffan Dickens. He was only 23 years old, and he found himself a minor celebrity.
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

Wonderful adaptation of a timeless classic

Andreas Niedermayer (leeds1@gmx.at), IMDb
27 December 2005
  • Summary: This is the first adaptation of Charles Dickens' famous novel that I came to see. The cast is simply great. Elijah Wood is a very cunning Artful Dodger. I was particularly fond of his wonderful British accent, which he delivers in the contemporary manner of old-fashioned grammar and marked shifts in intonation and stress. This must have been quite challenging for an American actor – I take my hat off to his performance.
  • Read full review
Next page >>