www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Oliver-twist.34041580
7.6 out of 10

Oliver Twist

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Oliver Twist

Showing 1-10 of 15
Overall 5
5.0

User Review

Matthew Brady, FilmCrave
26 February 2014
  • Summary: Oliver Twist (Barney Clark) is a young orphan in Victorian England who has been sent to a dank workhouse run by the miserly Mr. Bumble (Jeremy Swift) when it is learned there is no one to care for him. When Oliver dares to ask for more gruel, he is sent away to live with an undertaker, who treats him poorly. This movie is dark and very cruel at times with it's plot. the acting is fine and the all film as this grey and dirty look to it that lacks the film down for me.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Not the best version of Oliver Twist but not bad

TheLittleSongbird, IMDb
18 June 2012
  • Summary: For me, David Lean's film is still the best version of Charles Dickens' great novel. However, while flawed this 1933 version is worth seeing at least for curiosity value. It is too short at 70 minutes, and feels rather rushed narratively. Dickie Moore is cute as Oliver but looks comfortable and his performance consists of a lot of overdone facial expressions.
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.0

The Dickens Is in the Details

wes-connors, IMDb
9 May 2011
  • Summary: When it was obvious talking pictures were not going to be a fad, it was time to make sound versions of Charles Dickens' classics. In this case, the adaptation of "Oliver Twist" (1922) starring Jackie Coogan and Lon Chaney appears have been the inspiration. This revision comes from the low-budget "Monogram" studios and, while this is clearly what they would have considered a prestige production, today it comes across as cheap.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Considering it's from Monogram, it's surprisingly good.

planktonrules, IMDb
22 October 2010
  • Summary: I was a bit surprised to find that tiny and ultra-low budget studio Monogram made this Dickens story--well before the famous British version from the late 1940s and the Oscar-winning musical. Now because Monogram had few funds compared to the big studios, I expected the film to be terrible but it actually surprised me. It was competently made and in some ways surprisingly good.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Scenes Cut From Video Release

phillise, IMDb
2 October 2009
  • Summary: This is a good version of Oliver Twist I remember from my childhood. I saw it on TV in the US. However, I want to the poster who says that the scene where Oliver asks for more is missing entirely. It most definitely WAS filmed!It was very moving when shown on TV, as it has Oliver ask for another starving urchin--not exactly the way it was in the book, but let me sound a bit blasphemous for suggesting the scene one-uped Dickens.
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.0

User Review

Allison, FilmCrave
14 August 2009
  • Summary: Even though Oliver Twist is a classic story, Polanski is a great director, and the child actors are good, this never reached the greatness that most of his other films did. It is really sad. The film gets a little tiresome as it goes on. But it's not very terrible either.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Nice adaptation of the world-famous book well made by Tony Bill

ma-cortes, IMDb
20 October 2008
  • Summary: Homeless little boy Oliver(Trench)abandoned into orphanage and during one meal he pleads: 'Please, Sir I want some more'. He's mistreated and the abused orphan escapes and befriends Artful Dodger(a scoundrel Elijah Wood) a roguish pickpocket. Dodger introduces him into a band of youthful thieves commanded by Fagin(Richard Dreyfuss, also producer) in debt to the cruel Sikes(David O'Hara).
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.0

Watered Down Version

papccs, IMDb
9 April 2007
  • Summary: This, yet another version of Oliver Twist is something rather peripatetic. The plot, something which I'm certain most people know, in this movie is rather confusing. It comes across as the director throwing scenes together without any purpose. The scene where Oliver asks for more, is missing entirely. One minute Oliver watches a boy collapse in the field where they are working, the next Mr.
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.0

Good Acting but very difficult to understand

Roland Boike, IMDb
10 February 2007
  • Summary: The sound tract and voice quality left a lot to be desired. The director lacked experience in demanding proper enunciation from the actors. Parts of the movie were in whispers and turning up the volume was to no avail. The story by Charles Dickens is truly a classic, but unless you are a skilled lip reader you are destined to miss much of the action of the novel.
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.0

The First Hollywood Sound Version of OLIVER TWIST

theowinthrop, IMDb
15 January 2006
  • Summary: This 1933 film is just adequate like a detailed synopsis of the story of OLIVER TWIST. Unlike the 1948 Lean/Guiness blockbuster, or the 1968 Reed/Moody treat, this one is so-so. I only comment on it for two reasons. First Dicky Moore played Oliver (not as well as John Howard Davies or Mark Lester in the later two films. Apparently the director and producer were looking for a child star to mirror the 1922 silent film version with Jackie Coogan as Oliver and Lon Chaney Sr.
  • Read full review
Next page >>