Impossible to focus even at a quarter million miles
Larry Gillham, Amazon
23 May 2013
Summary: I made a mistake and tried to buy a very long lens, very cheaply. The lens really doesn't cost anything and that is exactly what you get. The lens I received simply CAN NOT be focused. I realize that at 100 yards, it only has a focal zone of 32 feet but last night I was trying to focus on the moon~250,000 miles away. No focus at any point, certainly not at infinity. My set up was a high quality tripod with an additional 20 pounds of lead weight for stability.
Summary: I purchased this used, however, if I didn't know it was "used", I would've thought it was new. A much better product than the older f/6.3 version due mainly to the smaller size. Photos are sharp with very little of any aberrations. The mount is a bit wobbly, however, I've come to expect that from t-mount lenses. That did not effect the sharpness at all. If you can find one of these in the seventy to eighty dollar price range, just buy it.
Summary: I've only spent an hour or so testing this lens, but so far I'm quite happy with it. But be realistic, this is NOT an "L" class lens, nor is it "fast glass"! For $100 (in round numbers), however, it is fairly decent. First, be sure to order an adapter that fits YOUR camera to go with it. For my Canon T3i, I got a fotodiox product, which has worked fine.
Summary: For each job you need a speicif lens. This lens like others, has limitations and is good for only certain things. Same as the other lenses you will have for your camera. Now do not expect a lens that runs $110 to give the results of a $2000 lens simply because it can magnify to 500mm. I have read mixed reviews of the lens, decided to get one and give it a try. Photos are from a Canon T2i, ISO 800, shutter 60. Taken at night.
Summary: Other reviews have pointed out the limits. My 2-cents is, once you get used to 'all manual' operation, the camera is great for long distance shots of closely grouped subjects. I'm an amateur, really only taking photos on vacations, wildlife trips, hikes, backyard etc. I just got a chance to really use this lens last week (purchased it through Amazon last year), and I'm happy with the results. Most of the problem photos were due to operator error and inexperience.
Summary: The 500mm is on Amazon for a bunch of different cameras, I think they are the same lens with a different ring mount. This lens is great for shooting shots across the waterways and at the zoo. With an f/8.0, it works best on a bright sunny day. Use of a tripod helps get sharp pictures. Simply put... I use it more for wildlife & that hard to get close shot when someone or something is in your way, very inexpensive easy to use once ya get used to it, can't complain.
Summary: Solid quality construction. Sturdy, yet lightweight, and doesn't have the least "dinky" feel to it. Very smooth focus ring with just the right amount of resistance. This f/8.0 version is, with its 72mm diameter, very portable and quite a bit smaller than the f/6.3 variant with its 92mm diameter.
Summary: I'm an amateur photographer and would like to have a 500mm telephoto lens without paying hundreds on dollars for it. If this is your case, and you want to accept the cons by the pros you can buy this lens. 1) The big con of this lens is really the fact that you'll have to do everything by yourself. Your camera will NOT function in automatic mode.
I dont understand why this product doesnt have good reviews
Kenneth J. Littell, Amazon
12 May 2010
Summary: I ordered this lens because I wanted to take photos of wild life near my property. After ordering it I was alarmed because of the negative reviews I had seen on the web, Remember, this is not a $3000 lens. It is NOT automatic and you must set the focus manually. As well, you must know how to operate your digital camera. (get out the instruction book) I was able to take some pretty wonderful photos only an hour and a half after it arrived.