Sony A350 ok; not great and definitely not Japanese quality
SAR, Amazon
3 March 2011
Summary: This review is a little late for a camera that came out in 2008. Still, for anyone who happens to be looking at buying one new or used, here goes.
Summary: I had the initial Sony DSLR A100 and decided to move up to the A 350. So far I have been very pleased with the camera. It has additional features not found on the A 100.
Summary: I've never once had to service Canon equipment that is over thirty years old; I am less confident in Sony because I've had other products (notably an HD camcorder) that
Summary: Plenty of camera for your $$$. Main problem is the very slow response. The time from shutter release to image on LCD is awfully long, seems to take ages to process...
Pros: Comfortable Controls, Easy To Use, Good colour, Good value, Image Stabilization, Sharp pictures
Cons: Clunky, Loud, Not too good at high ISO, Obviously cheap build, Very slow response
Summary: Plenty of camera for your $$$. Main problem is the very slow response. The time from shutter release to image on LCD is awfully long, seems to take ages to process...
Pros: Comfortable Controls, Easy To Use, Good colour, Good value, Image Stabilization, Sharp pictures
Cons: Clunky, Loud, Not too good at high ISO, Obviously cheap build, Very slow response
Summary: Please read all comments to this posting as I may add comments as I gain experience. I have taken photos with the A350 using both the 18-70 (f3.5 to 5.6) Sony lens and...
Summary: A350 was my first DSLR... I only buy it because of it's Quick AF Live View feature: Very Good, like a compact camera. I just don't use the viewfinder...