www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3
5.1 out of 10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3

This digital camera has an optical zoom of 10 x while its digita Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3

Showing 1-10 of 500
Overall 10
10

As good a purchase as I've ever made.

imunuri, Amazon
9 November 2013
  • Summary: I have used this camera for several years and it has been just great. I especially appreciate its simplicity of design. For example, the battery charger is just a plastic box, two inches by two inches and an inch deep, with a space to insert the battery on one side and flip-out prongs to go in an...
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Only 2-year lasting toy

Tae E Choe, Amazon
25 December 2010
  • Summary: I bought this camera (panasonic lumix) 2 years ago and its CCD is totally crashed now and shows nothing. Warranty of CCD is 6 month. So, if you want to use a camera for 6 month and ready to trash it, then I recommend you to buy this.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Very disappointing! Totally unreliable.

Amazon
21 October 2010
  • Summary: Bought this camera in February 2008. Being very careful about my cameras, I was totally disappointed to realize that, suddenly, last September 2009, the display showed only blurred and purple "images". When looking at menus, display was perfect. Diagnostic from Panasonic Service Center: CCD dead!
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Panasonic LUMIX TZ3 Digital Camera

Amazon
20 September 2010
  • Summary: This camera is simple to use with a multitude of settings and options available for the more advanced user. It includes a Movie option, and has a large selection of 'specialty' modes including a setting for underwater photos (color adjustment).
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

High Hopes Dashed by Bizarre Skin Tones on Any Setting...

Amazon
29 August 2010
  • Summary: I purchased this camera in 2009, before a trip to Disney World. The camera handled beautifully and the battery life was great considering I took approximately 3000 pictures on our trip.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

if you are taking pictures indoors SKIP THIS CAMERA

Jen L "Jen L", Amazon
4 May 2010
  • Summary: I have had this camera for a few years now and i am just your average person taking pictures of my child. This camera takes the WORST pictures indoors. If the lighting is low, even with a flash the picture will be washed out or too dark. Outside the pictures are lovely.
  • Read full review
Overall 7
7.0

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3

George123, CNET
5 April 2009
  • Summary: What I need is a good workhorse that I can slip in my pocket and take lots of clear and detailed digital photographs on construction sites. This works well (generally) . I've now had it for a couple of years It's reasonably tough, it slips in the pocket, it gets good detail, and it's pretty well...
  • Pros: Good photo quality, compact, robust, simple to use, good optical zoom
  • Cons: photos sometimes blurred
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Does this camera deserve the lens?

Noel Hastings "Emergency Medicine MD", Amazon
19 April 2008
  • Summary: Every digital camera seems to have one or two items that need improvement. I have discovered this camera's flaws now. This is an edited version of a previous review now that I have had more time with the camera.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Perfect balance of features and portability for the price

Damon "dodgeboy", Amazon
19 April 2008
  • Summary: I jumped into digital photography way before it was cool, spent far to much money, and soon after bought a nice 35mm slr and a scanner. I refused to spend more money on new digital until I could pack nearly all of the quality features of my slr into a small carryable digital.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Superb Camera!

John McQuitty, Amazon
19 April 2008
  • Summary: I have to get on the bandwagon here. This is a superb little camera, definately five stars! I also have the TZ1, which showed promise, but has limitations. In my review of the TZ1, I noted it had lots of "noise" and pictures shouldn't be printed much beyond 4x6 inches if they were to be sharp.
  • Read full review
Next page >>