www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Digitalcameras.46128
3.4 out of 10

Oregon Scientific DS6618

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Oregon Scientific DS6618

Showing 1-10 of 26
Overall 10
10

Great

cosmofishpattan, Ebay
10 February 2011
  • Summary: I love the size of the camera . Works great in my pocket.Very handy .Love Oregon Scientific products .
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Oregon Scientific DS 6618 0.31 Megapixel Pocket Camera

celticeilidh, Ebay
28 September 2008
  • Summary: This is my 11th camera of this type. I love these & I get fantastic results from them. Their best features are their size, credit card sized, and the fact that they have a rechargeable battery. I carry one with me all the time so if I see anything I like or anything odd, I shoot it. The down side is that they break very easily, out of 11 cameras this will be the only working one.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Piss-Poor Camera

awhurst, Ebay
29 August 2008
  • Summary: Might be an ok camera EXCEPT for the fact that you CANNOT change the battery once it wears out and won't take a charge. THIS MAKES IT A "THROW-AWAY" CAMERA, a PRETTY EXPENSIVE disposable camera. I wish somebody had told me this before I wasted my time and money. No matter how good the pictures are, if you can't get or keep power to the unit, it's useless! ALL of these WILL end up in the trash at some point. Be sure to check if the battery can be replaced AND by what.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0
Ease of use 8
8.0
Durability 8
8.0
Battery performance 10
10
Photo quality 2
2.0
Shutter lag 4
4.0

Not for parents wanting to catch those special moments

faithdean, epinions.com
18 February 2008
  • Summary: I guess I could recommend this camera if you always take photos in bright sunlight and have an iron-steady hand. Otherwise, look elsewhere.
  • Pros: Inexpensive, easy to take along, easy image download.
  • Cons: Basically only good for taking outdoors pictures.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

BAD PRODUCT

bd103151, Ebay
3 September 2007
  • Summary: THIS TURNED OUT TO BE A BAD PRODUCT. THE RECHARAGABLE BATTERY IS DEAD AND CANNOT BE RECHARGED. THE PRODUCT IS WORTHLESS.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Very convenient!

cucku, Ebay
16 August 2007
  • Summary: This is a great camera. You can carry it with you anywhere you go. Plus you could put your credit cards in the back of the slim case. Very convenient!
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Oregon Scientific DS 66180.31 is not worth the money!

wellsie.deals, Ebay
9 October 2006
  • Summary: This camera is horrible! Do not waste your money! It takes hours to charge and after 5 pictures the battery is gone again! How frustrating! Plus, taking the picture is akward. You have to aim a little above the object to get it all in the picture! Buy another camera!
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10
Ease of use 10
10
Durability 10
10
Battery performance 10
10
Photo quality 6
6.0
Shutter lag 6
6.0

What The &^%$#!!

gadgetluvr67, epinions.com
15 October 2005
  • Excerpt: Hey I've got a wrist watch (fossil abacus)that tells me the news, weather, stocks and other informat
  • Pros: Small, futuristic, rechargeable battery,awesome looking, functional
  • Cons: it's not invisible? But close! :)
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Ease of use 10
10
Durability 6
6.0
Battery performance 8
8.0
Photo quality 4
4.0
Shutter lag 8
8.0

Good to keep in bag

hyphenate, epinions.com
29 August 2005
  • Excerpt: I got this for $10 from a yard sale and the best part of it is that I keep it in my handbag and forg
  • Pros: Portability, P&S quickness, and size.
  • Cons: Not the greatest of images and lack of megapixel clarity.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Ease of use 10
10
Durability 6
6.0
Battery performance 6
6.0
Photo quality 4
4.0
Shutter lag 4
4.0

For twenty bucks, I'm not complaining

tls11823, epinions.com
12 March 2005
  • Summary: If you can get it for $20-25, grab it as a convenient spare as long as you can get by with low quality pics
  • Pros: Small and cheap, battery charges through USB port
  • Cons: Low-quality images, no way to preview pictures, no flash
  • Read full review
Next page >>