Conclusion: When the D300 was introduced back in 2007 (simultaneously with the D3) for $1800, it was a huge step forward from the D2X/D2XS, which was until that point Nikon’s
Conclusion: When the D300 was introduced back in 2007 (simultaneously with the D3) for $1800, it was a huge step forward from the D2X/D2XS, which was until that point Nikon’s
Conclusion: The bottom line is that we loved taking pictures with the D300S. Quite apart from image quality, it's so quick to use and adjust that you'll hardly ever miss a shot.
Cons: 12.3 megapixels seem low these days, Video only 24 fps and 720p, Noise at high ISO levels, Body does not have image stabilization, Cheaper Nikon D7000 offers more
Excerpt: When Nikon's D300 hit stores about two years ago, it wowed everyone with its high-resolution LCD, 14-bit RAW capture, and sophisticated AF and metering systems that
Conclusion: While the lack of any increase in pixel count may disappoint some, using this as a basis to dismiss the D300s would be unfair, as quality shouldn't be based on the pixel
Summary: The impressive is an update of the well-regarded D300 DX format digital SLR body, and is a recommended upgrade for existing Nikon users, or as a new body for
Summary: Nikon updated one of the most well-received digital SLRs on the market with the Nikon D300S, a digital SLR with the same 12.3-megapixel sensor, a slightly faster frame
Pros: Rugged construction; mag-alloy body and full environmental sealing, Low noise levels and excellent sharpness/detail up to ISO 800, very good images at ISO 1,600, Autom...
Cons: JPEGs at default settings are slightly soft-looking, 14-bit RAW mode shows continuous shooting from 7 fps to 2.7 fps, Auto white balance has trouble with household inc...