Browse Categories

6.6 out of 10

Nikon D2X

12.84 megapixels, first seen: 21 October 2004

Information found in: from 50 sources in 20 countries.

Best Price at Amazon

  • User Score (87)
    9.6 9.6 from 87 reviewers
  • Expert Score (16)
    8.4 8.4 from 16 reviewers
  • Design (6)
    6.2 6.2 from 6 reviewers
  • Value for money (11)
    6.4 6.4 from 11 reviewers
  • Features (3)
    7.1 7.1 from 3 reviewers
  • Ease of use (13)
    6.9 6.9 from 13 reviewers
  • Picture quality (12)
    6.9 6.9 from 12 reviewers
More grades Less grades

Pros & Cons

  • multi talented camera, robust construction, fast shooter, as well, environmental sealing ensures reliability
  • fast shutter lag, af points layout, dust attractor, more options, excellent image quality
  • DX Format with 12.4 effective megapixels
  • The new CMOS image sensor features high image quality and high-speed 4-channel data output
  • New image processing algorithms combine with optimized analog and digital white balance to produce smoother, more consistent gradations with exceptionally pure color reproduction
  • Continuous shooting: 5 frames per second (fps) at 12.4 megapixels for up to 15 consecutive NEF (Nikon Electronic Format) images; 8 fps for 26 NEF images …

Specifications

  • Format
    SLR
  • Release Status
    Discontinued
  • Max resolution
    4288 x 2848
  • Low resolution
    3216 x 2136, 2144 x 1424
  • Image ratio w:h
    3:2
  • Effective pixels
    12.2 million
  • Sensor photo detectors
    12.8 million
  • Sensor size
    23.7 x 15.7 mm (3.72 cm²)
  • Pixel density
    3.3 MP/cm²
  • Sensor type
    CMOS

Release Date

  • First seen
    21 October 2004

Be the first to write a Wiki Description

Edit

  • Reviews of Nikon D2X

  1. The Nikon D2x; Nikon’s Flagship Pro Digital SLR

    Reviewer: Shutterbug
    1 August 2005

    When Nikon announced the D2X last year at photokina there was a good deal of anticipation about it, and a good wait that followed until it finally arrived. In the meantime, Canon countered with their EOS-1Ds Mark II, which in many ways shaped the competitive landscape. With a street price of $4999.95, Nikon’s flagship digital SLR is $3000 less than the $8000 (body only) Mark II, albeit with a smaller CMOS sensor. Has the D2X met and surpassed expectations? In my mind... Read more

  2. Reviewer: DP Review
    6 January 2005

    It wouldn't be harsh to say that some people were disappointed with the D2H, a great body with excellent performance let down by a slightly experimental sensor which didn't perform to the same level as the rest of the camera. With the D2X Nikon has shifted to a CMOS sensor, and although not yet as clean as Canon's second generation CMOS sensors at higher sensitivities there's no doubting the amount of detail captured combined with Nikon's image processing can produce... Read more

  3. Short Report: Nikon D2x

    Reviewer: PCPhoto
    28 May 2009

    The top-of-the-line D-SLR from Nikon features 12 megapixels, blistering speed and a bigger, brighter LCD Read more

  4. Nikon D2X review

    Reviewer: Let's go digital
    30 January 2006

    Nikon D2X digital SLR review : When Nikon introduced the D2H reflex camera for the enhanced action/photojournalist; the world expected the camera to be followed by a D2X very promptly. This was the case with the D1 series and the Internet rumours made us expect the new flagship any minute. But while Canon reacted quickly with a fast camera equipped with high resolution, the Nikon users had to be patient and wait a bit longer until Nikon finally put the Nikon D2X on the... Read more

  5. Nikon D2x/D2xs Review

    Reviewer: By Thom
    10 September 2006

    Corrections, added conclusion: 5/4/05 Corrections, ACR 3.1 5/6/05 Update: 10/05/05 D2xs update: 8/30/06 WT-2 comments: 1/22/07 Nikon D2x and D2xs Review Was the wait worth it? Add a comment or send Thom feedback on this article. I've added D2xs-specific comments in red. The D2xs is enough like the D2x that the bulk of the review is still valid. I haven't bothered to replace "D2x" with "D2x and D2xs" in the original portions of the review, but you can safely do so as you... Read more

  1. A fine camera, wonderful handling and great ergonomics.

    Reviewer: tomlianza, Ecoustics
    7 April 2008
    Overall 10
    10
    Ease of use 10
    10
    Picture quality 10
    10
     

    I've used Nikon cameras for approximately 40 years. I typically use an F100 (film based), N80. I also have the D100. The D2x is in a class by itself. The image quality is very high for a digital. What I really appreciate about this camera is the handling and the ergonomic placement of the controls. I took it out of the box and just started using, no instructions needed. The ISO, White Balance and Quality level are grouped and easy to see. The view finder presents all... Read more

  2. Reviewer: dalegaspi, Fredmiranda
    13 January 2008
    Overall 10
    10
     

    I have been shooting with the D200 for almost three years and I was only able to acquire a (used) D2x relatively cheap because of the arrival of the newer D3 model which somehow made most of the D2x owners allergic to their perfectly useable camera. Not that I'm complaining, though. As far as handling goes, I knew that the D2x blows away the D200 before I even got it (I used to own an F5); while most users find the weight a deterrent, I--on the other hand--find this as a... Read more

  3. "The pro´s first choice..."

    Reviewer: CNET
    19 July 2005
    Overall 10
    10
     

    This is by far the best professional digital SLR out. I did a comparison with the 1Ds MkII, and Nikon won out in both print size/quality, and color rendition. It is by far superior in contrast range, and it gives you a two for one option with 12.4 mp at 5 fps, and 6.8 mp at 8 fps. Tested it for sports and nature photography, and if you know your lenses, the autofocus is unbeatable. I can see that amateurs are having trouble with lens choices, so they cannot use the... Read more

  4. Excellent Camera, beautiful photographs, easy navigation menu, many options

    Reviewer: DealTime UK
    16 July 2008

    Before upgrading to the D300s, I used the D2x to take and sell nature and wildlife photographs, and as long as I kept the ISO at 400 or below, I was very happy with it. After using the D70, D2H, and D2Hs, I finally was able to purchase a used D2X from a Professional Wildlife Photographer. I have loved it since I purchased it. The only downside that I find is the high noise levels at higher ISO's and darker, night shots. I have to soften sky backgrounds when the noise... Read more

  5. Reviewer: DP Review
    11 February 2009
    Overall 10
    10
    Value for money 10
    10
    Features 10
    10
    Ease of use 10
    10
    Picture quality 10
    10
     

    I'm now on my second D2x body after having sold Body #1 and regretting it ever Read more

Ask the community

Need more advice? Ask the community a question.

Video Reviews

  • Default
  • Default
  • Thumbnailserver2?app=vss&contentid=be76c1abcc919f1c&offsetms=135000&itag=w160&hl=en&sigh=vw9o_yynsplaby53txopignosvk
  • 2
  • 2
  • Thumbnailserver2?app=vss&contentid=384b93c976b40b35&label=cover_thumb&offsetms=5000&itag=w320&lang=en&sigh=rhlmfqgm2ldjfhpbov-wiygs30s
  • 2
Price comparison partners:
Shopping.com  PriceScan  Shopper