www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Nikon COOLPIX S2500
6.5 out of 10

Nikon COOLPIX S2500

Ultra-slim and designed to please. USB charging via Charging A Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Nikon COOLPIX S2500

Showing 1-10 of 12
Overall 8
8.4
Design 9
8.5
Value for money 9
9.0
Features 8
8.0
Performance 9
8.5
Picture quality 8
8.0

Nikon COOLPIX S2500 Review

What Digital Camera
15 March 2011
  • Summary: The market for £100 cameras has really improved in quality over recent years. Where once you’d struggle to purchase anything respectable around that price, there are now a host of models vying for pole position.
  • Pros: Good design, great value, decent images
  • Cons: Simple interface and shooting controls, average LCD screen, plasticy body
  • Read full review

Expert Review

Tech Reviews
5 September 2011
  • Conclusion: If you want a no thrills camera that produces okay results without any hassle, the Nikon Coolpix S2500 is a good option.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Design 8
8.0
Value for money 9
9.0
Features 8
8.0
Ease of use 9
9.0
Picture quality 8
8.0

Nikon Coolpix S2500

PhotographyBLOG
27 May 2011
  • Summary: The Nikon Coolpix S2500 costs less than £100 so for the money, the image quality is very good. It's pretty to look at fits perfectly in your pocket. Teenagers will find the slim design attractive and anyone who isn't photographically minded will also be able to get on with the camera.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Nikon Coolpix S2500 review

expertreviews.co.uk
23 May 2011
  • Excerpt: From the outside, the S2500 closely resembles the Nikon S3100 , a camera with the unfortunate claim to having the worst image quality we've seen in a long time. The S2500 costs less but its photos are significantly better.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Design 8
8.0
Value for money 8
8.0
Features 6
6.0
Picture quality 6
6.0
Overall quality 8
8.0
Photo quality - landscapes 6
6.0
Photo quality - macro 4
4.0
Photo quality - portraits 8
8.0
Photo quality - low light 6
6.0
Photo quality - sports 8
8.0

Nikon COOLPIX S2500

digicambuyer.co.uk
13 April 2011
  • Conclusion: A good-looking camera that’s refreshingly slim, light and good value for money. It’s just let down by the LCD panel that makes the camera almost unusable outdoors
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Nikon Coolpix S2500

Pocket Lint
8 March 2011
  • Conclusion: The Nikon Coolpix S2500 succeeds in delivering a budget point-and-shoot solution. It’s a fairly basic camera, but then for under a hundred quid you’re essentially getting exactly what you pay for.
  • Pros: Cheap, in-camera Colour Options
  • Cons: Poor LCD, unreliable AF, no HD video
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Nikon Coolpix S2500 review

TechRadar UK
2 March 2011
  • Summary: Easy to use and easy to carry
  • Pros: Very affordable, Handles tricky light conditions well, Simple to use
  • Cons: Very no frills, Lack of guide function
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.0

Nikon Coolpix S2500

pcworld.pl
20 September 2011
  • Conclusion: Wyjątkowo małe wymiary obudowy Nikona S2500 oczywiście ograniczają jej funkcjonalność. Nie znajdziemy wielu pokręteł czy chociażby małego kółka zmiany wartości. Na tylnej ściance, prócz 2,7-calowego wyświetlacza zmieścił się nawigator oeaz 4 podstawowe przyciski.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 6
6.0

Automaatti

mbnet.fi
16 May 2011
  • Conclusion: Valikossa on automaattitila ja videointi, valmiita kuvaustiloja ja pari erikoisempaa tarkennusta. Automaattitilassa asetuksia pitää etsiä tosissaan, sillä päävalikossa on toinen sivu, josta löytyy herkkyyksien ...
  • Pros: Laajakulma, Yksinkertainen
  • Cons: Videokuva, Kuvanlaatu heikkenee vähässä valossa.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 7
7.0

Nikon Coolpix S2500

CNET
4 May 2011
  • Conclusion: Le petit prix du Nikon Coolpix S2500 ne permet pas d’en attendre la perfection. Mais cet appareil photo compact est petit, facile d’usage et délivre des performances et des fonctions plutôt impressionnantes pour son prix.
  • Pros: Rapport qualité-prix, tient dans la poche, très simple d'utilisation.
  • Cons: Couleurs parfois brûlées, qualité en dessous de la moyenne de l'écran LCD.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>