www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Nikon-coolpix-s220.21015997
5.2 out of 10

Nikon COOLPIX S220

Nikonâ. Camera Type: Ultra-Compact Resolution: 10.7 Megapixe Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Nikon COOLPIX S220

Showing 1-9 of 9
Overall 8
7.7
Value for money 10
10
Functionality 8
8.0
Audio & image quality 6
6.0
Appearance 10
10
Build quality 6
6.0

Nikon Coolpix S220 Digital Camera Review

Buy-n-Shoot.com
14 September 2009
  • Conclusion: While some lens, LCD, and image quality is sacrificed in the Coolpix S220 for its affordable price tag and ultra compact body, overall this unit undoubtedly offers a lot of style and portability for a very little asking price.  One certainly worth considering if looking to purchase a stylish but positively simple compact camera within this price range.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Value for money 8
8.0
Features 8
8.0
Ease of use 9
9.0
Photo quality 8
8.0
Build quality 8
8.0
Color and saturation 8
8.0

Nikon Coolpix S220

Cameras
8 August 2014
  • Conclusion: The Nikon Coolpix S220 has a lot going for it. If I was being picky I would say picture quality could be that bit better, but there is only so much you can expect from such a small camera at this lower price.
  • Pros: Ease of use - colours - brightness - size - fast turn on time
  • Cons: Noisy pictures at higher ISO settings.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.3
Performance 8
8.3

Nikon's Coolpix S220 takes on Canon camera throne with well priced, quality compact

PC Authority
21 December 2009
  • Summary: Simple controls, friendly design and a tiny size make the Nikon Coolpix S220
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Nikon Coolpix S220 review

PC Advisor
6 October 2009
  • Summary: The Nikon Coolpix S220 is a decent, basic point-and-shoot, but you can find a few better options among cameras in the £150 price range.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Design 10
10
Value for money 10
10
Features 8
8.0
Picture quality 6
6.0
Overall quality 8
8.0
Photo quality - landscapes 8
8.0
Photo quality - macro 6
6.0
Photo quality - portraits 8
8.0
Photo quality - low light 6
6.0
Photo quality - sports 6
6.0

Nikon COOLPIX S220

digicambuyer.co.uk
14 July 2009
  • Conclusion: In this financial climate this compact could do extremely well and for the amateur photographer the S220 really offers good value for money.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.3
Value for money 8
8.3
Features 7
6.7
Picture quality 8
8.3

Nikon Coolpix S220

PC Pro
17 June 2009
  • Conclusion: Simple controls, friendly design and a tiny size make this a great choice for summer snaps.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
7.7
Value for money 10
10
Picture quality 6
6.0

Nikon Coolpix S220 Digital Camera Review

Buy-n-Shoot.com
3 May 2009
  • Excerpt: The Coolpix S220 is an ultra compact, 10-megapixel new release from Nikon that is as simple to operate, as it is delightfully small. Available in five colours including silver, green, blue, purple and pink, the S220 is a funky little unit likely to appeal to fun-loving happy-snappers famous for taking their camera with them wherever they go. At just 18mm wide, 89.5mm long and 55.5mm high...
  • Read full review
Overall 7
7.0

Nikon Coolpix S220 digital camera review

Pocket Lint
12 March 2009
  • Pros: Compact, lightweight, good build quality, easy to use
  • Cons: Image quality not fantastic, tendency to over-expose, noise issues with ISO bumping
  • Read full review
Overall 7
6.8

Nikon Coolpix S220: gut ausgestattete Schnappschusskamera

CNET
16 July 2009
  • Summary: Sicherlich, eine DSLR ist eine tolle Sache. Allerdings auch eine teure. Wer seine Kamera immer und überall mitnehmen möchte, Partys und gemütliche Runden knipsen will, der will keine unhandliche Spiegelreflexkamera. Vor allem, wenn die Bilder ohnehin nur auf Facebook, MySpace, Lokalisten & Co. erscheinen sollen. Da ist ergibt eine günstige Kompaktkamera mehr Sinn – zumal es nicht gar so wehtut, wenn statt 600 nur 120 Euro in der Bowle landen.
  • Pros: gute Ausstattung für diese Klasse, tolles, kompaktes Design, sehr günstig
  • Cons: mittelmäßige Bildqualität, langsam
  • Read full review Translate to English