www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Nikon-coolpix-l620.33940395
8.3 out of 10

Nikon Coolpix L620

High quality images even in low light situations Consecutive Read more

Great Deal: $149.99

Reviews and Problems with Nikon Coolpix L620

Showing 1-10 of 19
Overall 4
4.0
Value for money 4
4.0
Features 4
4.0
Ease of use 4
4.0
Picture quality 4
4.0

Good for people taking vacation photos

spaceman, Bestbuy
27 August 2014
  • Summary: Very hard to get good photos with this...
  • Pros: Not much
  • Cons: The picture quality is nt very good
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Two Stars

scott upton, Amazon
17 August 2014
Overall 4
4.0

Takes a good picture but very hard to use

Gary P Ritchie, Amazon
15 July 2014
  • Summary: Went on vacation to Europe and bought this camera for our trip. Takes a good picture but very hard to use. The zoom/autofocus was very slow. Some shots were missed due to the time it took for the camera to focus. This camera eats batteries. Half a day and the batteries were shot. I don't recommend the camera,, too hard to keep working.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I'm not impressed at all. This is the best Nikon can offer in this price range? Avoid ! Very very slow.

Jeri Zerr "formerly a Road Warrior of the Nth..., Amazon
28 June 2014
  • Summary: The focus lags severely. The shutter lags even worse despite having an extremely fast memory card that otherwise works great even in RAW mode on my Canon 70D. I am very very disappointed in this camera. Sure it isn't a Canon T5i, a Canon 70D nor a Mark III, but I definitely expect better results from today's technology, especially from Nikon. I had considered returning it after the first experience, but I hoped an even better memory card would help. It didn't.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Disappointing

Jenna Hall, Amazon
3 June 2014
  • Summary: I found this camera very frustrating. I keep getting messages that the battery is run down after putting in new batteries twice. It is very difficult to get the battery compartment open and very difficult to get it closed with batteries inside. I find the shutter speed very slow. I wish I would have purchased another camera. I bought it because I loved my first Nikon Coolpix, not this one. I will not purchase another.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0
Value for money 4
4.0
Ease of use 4
4.0
Picture quality 2
2.0
Battery performance 6
6.0

User Review

happyhiker63, Walmart
19 April 2014
  • Summary: I bought this camera to replace the camera I had broken, same model but boy what a difference.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0
Value for money 8
8.0
Ease of use 8
8.0
Picture quality 6
6.0
Battery performance 4
4.0

User Review

bucky234, Walmart
10 February 2014
  • Summary: But you can buy one online for $29.95. In my view ,it should either be provided or the customer should be made aware that an additional purchase is necessary.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

stop working middle of vacation

dean lucas, Amazon
24 January 2014
  • Summary: piece of crap bought brand new stopped working third day went and replaced with a Fuji point and shoot lov it
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

I have one now and am disappointed with the quality of pictures, brightness of video, and sturdiness

Pastor Rob, Amazon
20 January 2014
  • Summary: I have it propped up now letting the Gorilla superglue dry. The pressure from the batteries against the battery door is strong making it a bit challenging to open and close, no problem, but it eventually took it's toll on the tiny plastic fold that holds the door shut and I've only had the camera for a few weeks (bought it Christ-mass eve).
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

not good for dermatology photos

Adam C. Byrd, Amazon
11 January 2014
  • Summary: I am a dermatology resident and I like to take photos of skin conditions. I had a Canon point-and-shoot (can't recall the model number, but it was about $300 according to my wife) that leaves this thing in the dust. Unfortunately I lost it. On the "easy / auto" mode it takes forever to focus, and often it does not focus well at that. On the macro mode it is no better. Then (I guess due to smaller processor?
  • Read full review
Next page >>