www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Nikon-coolpix-5400.33887040
4.1 out of 10

Nikon COOLPIX 5400

The true beauty of the new COOLPIX 5400 is found in its world-re Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Nikon COOLPIX 5400

Showing 1-10 of 22
Overall 6
6.0
Ease of use 4
4.0
Durability 10
10
Battery performance 4
4.0
Photo quality 10
10
Shutter lag 6
6.0

The Nikon Coolpix 5400. Good camera, bad service

ecofriend, epinions.com
18 May 2005
  • Excerpt: The camera itself is a fine piece of equipment, especially if it is purchased for daylight photograp
  • Pros: High quality, feature laden camera, excellent optics for macro users.
  • Cons: After sale service is a major problem for Nikon users.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Ease of use 4
4.0
Durability 8
8.0
Battery performance 2
2.0
Photo quality 6
6.0
Shutter lag 6
6.0

Not the easiest camera for an amateur...

beckysensei, epinions.com
10 May 2005
  • Excerpt: I had done a great deal of research before buying a new digital camera (I'd had a 2.1MP Olympus Came
  • Pros: The cool swivel screen in back; all the bells and whistles if you're into that.
  • Cons: HORRIBLE BATTERY LIFE!! Blurry close-ups; all the bells and whistles if you're not into that.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Photo quality 6
6.0
Shutter lag 4
4.0

Getting old - look elsewhere

hbj200, epinions.com
3 February 2005
  • Excerpt: The Coolpix 5400 is a model that's nearly two years old and, in digital photograpy terms, it's alrea
  • Pros: Lots of controls, can be found at a good price
  • Cons: Picture quality not up to par, slow speed, small LCD screen, discontinued
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

"Good Camera but lack of real shutter sound"

CNET
5 February 2004
  • Pros: Good picture once you learn how to use it.
  • Cons: Slow writing to CF card. Fast fill-up of buffer in 5M Pixel fine mode. Unlike Canon this model do not have 3M or 4M Pixel mode only 2M Pixel or below. No shutter sound loudness adjustmen like Canon or Sony. No mechancial shutter sound selection Like Canon
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

"High Quality camera"

CNET
29 December 2003
  • Pros: Great macro lens... Kevin in Ithica must have gotten the wrong camera in his Nikon box! Like the variety of settings, both auto and manual. Hard to take a bad photo with this camera. Nice feel, professional quality.
  • Cons: 16mb flash card is too small. For a superior macro camera it's a joke that the optional SL-1 ring light won't even adapt to this camera - a major product oversight by Nikon.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

"Great pictures, not that hard to use"

CNET
24 November 2003
  • Pros: I liked most things about the camera. The 28mm lens is great for taking building shots. Interior shots are great with no flash. Like all the different settings. The price just came down spent $100 more a month ago. All around great camera.
  • Cons: The time between pushing the button and the pitcure taken to long in low light. on high setting takes to long to process picture. Not much else. Great camera
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Ease of use 8
8.0
Durability 8
8.0
Battery performance 8
8.0
Photo quality 8
8.0
Shutter lag 8
8.0

Nikon CoolPix 5400: Decent camera but can it trump the competition?

yusakugo, epinions.com
12 July 2003
  • Summary: Solid camera overall but lacks punch that the competition adds. Maybe more improvements in 5 Megapixel CCD sensors have to come before expecting so much from prosumer 5MP cameras?
  • Pros: Tons of features, decent battery life, excellent closeup macro ability, etc.
  • Cons: soft images, images less sharp than my Canon S50, slightly worse image than 5000
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Nikon

pinky-20, eBay.de
7 February 2008
  • Summary: Ich habe mich für dieses Produkt entschieden weil die Firma Nikon sehr gute Apparate herstellt. Der ebayer war sehr freundlich, allerdings war die Speicherkarte die mitgeliefert worde ist, wahrscheinlich komprimiert worden weil sie beim Löschen der Bilder über den computer, diesen hat abstürzen lassen.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 5
5.2
Performance 8
8.0
Picture quality 6
6.0
Display 2
2.0
Ergonomics 2
2.0

CCd defectuoso

chuse, quesabesde.com
10 November 2006
  • Summary: Solo he podido utilizar tres veces la camara ya que cuando la he ido a utilizar ahora el ccd se ha roto. En toal unas 1000 fotos y camara a la basura ya que la garantia de usa es solo por un año y ya se paso en septiembre. Me dicen en el servicio tecnico que si que falla el ccd de muchas maquinas pero si la quiero arreglar 2oo euros. En total una birria de camara que se estropea sola en un cajon.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 6
6.0

User Review

killhanter, club.foto.ru
2 June 2006
  • Excerpt: После многолетнего юзания зеркалок трудно адекватно оценить ЭТО. Качество картинки неплохое, если не считать синтетический налет, удобство эксплуатации тянет на твердую тройку, ужасные шумы на ISO, отличной от 50
  • Pros: Макро
  • Cons: Все, что не макро. Отвратительная работа автофокуса при "несолнечном" свете, ручной фокус также оставляет желать лучшего (дико неудобно), шумы на ISO от 100 к ISO 400 превращаются в сплошной шум, объектив - пылесос.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>