It always took great shots and I got many compliments
14 September 2014
Summary: I had this same model from 10 years ago. It always took great shots and I got many compliments. The image clarity was very good. Also it's very easy to use. I tried other higher megapixel cameras, but they usually took too long to take another photo.
Excerpt: When I first bought this digital camera 5 years ago it was one of the best cameras on the market and I was so proud of it. I would take it where ever I went and I went through all the instructions. I really like the fact that it has …
Summary: I got this 2 or 3 years ago, when I was in year 7. I begged and begged my parents for one and they agreed on getting me this - although I was hoping for something more funky looking. But after I had it, I just absolutly loved it! :) It's great! It's very durable.
Summary: Reviews of this camera, as late as the Fall of 2004, seem to place the Coolpix 2100 above all its competitors (2 Mpxl, non-SLR). My two complaints: there is no manual focus (but you can use the focus lock, half-depressing the shutter switch, to "lock in" a focus range - except in macro mode), and a...
Excellent camera for the price (but use the right battery)
Lawrence You, Amazon
10 September 2004
Summary: I have been using a Nikon Coolpix 950 (2MP) camera for several years and decided to buy the 2100 as a gift for my wife around 12/2003 from Amazon. I had been satisfied with the quality of photographs for the 950 and am now also satisfied with the 2100.
Summary: The thing I love most about this camera is that it is small. It is great for snapshots and party pictures. If you are an inexperienced photographer or just like taking simple pictures, this camera is for you. It adjusts light settings and such based on what situation you are in.
Summary: There is nothing wrong with the 2100 except for the very noticeable delay between pics. The camera's digital processor takes about 5 seconds after a photo is snapped to ready itself for the next one.