www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Kodak-dx6340.487138
3.9 out of 10

Kodak DX6340

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Kodak DX6340

Showing 1-8 of 8
Overall 4
4.0

"Great cam crappy parts..."

lilboutonnez23, CNET
1 December 2005
  • Pros: easy to use no frills just take pictures for the amatures kind of camera 3.1 mp is nice with a 128mb card you can take around 220 pictures.
  • Cons: Parts are extremly crappy important parts are made out of plastic! Takes a long time to take multiple pictures.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

"customer service poor"

cnebeardsley, CNET
20 May 2005
  • Pros: easy to use
  • Cons: poor image quality; poor customer service
  • Read full review
Overall 3
3.0

"If you need service, your're in trouble"

CNET
17 February 2005
  • Pros: I love the camera. It is my first digital camera and I have had a lot of fun with it. Easy to use, great pictures, except when there is too much light.
  • Cons: The battery door broke (crumbled) before the camera was a year old. During the holidays it was impossible to get thru on the phone. I emailed, but the link they sent didn't work. Finally got the camera to Kodak's repair service. Big surprise, Kodak do
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

"Battery door will break."

CNET
24 November 2004
  • Pros: 4x optical zoom timestamp feature
  • Cons: Battery door flimsy; many people have reported breaking the battery door; I bought it in spite of seeing this concern because of perceived value; however, my batter door broke too.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Okay pictures, but poor design and memory never worked

John F. Krotzer, Amazon
2 May 2004
  • Summary: We bought this camera because we wanted a nice small digital to complement our large Sony Mavica with a 10x optical zoom. The camera takes okay pictures - I cannot really complain or boast - but there are two things that make this a camera to stay away from: FIRST, the Secure Digital memory never worked. We bought a 64 Mb card when we purchased the camera, and the camera never recognized it. Retruned it to Amazon and got another - also didn't work.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

"My old DC210 is a strong contender."

CNET
7 November 2003
  • Pros: This is going to be a tough review and I would REALLY appreciate some help and feedback. I am basically a snapshot taker of family trips and events. My six year old Kodak DC210 has provided excellent service but is limited by a very minimal zoom range an
  • Cons: On to the cons - The product manual describes the flash range on my old DC210 as being only 10 feet, yet every indoor auditorium or nightime shot ever taken has never had a problem illuminating the entire picture, regardless of the lighting quality avail
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0
Ease of use 8
8.0
Durability 6
6.0
Battery performance 2
2.0
Photo quality 4
4.0
Shutter lag 6
6.0

kodak dx6340- spoiled by over-compression of images

tonewheeldude, epinions.com
23 August 2003
  • Summary: photos at 6x4 are fine, but anyone that likes good quality images should avoid.
  • Pros: handy camera with 4x optical zoom, fun video option.
  • Cons: 12:1 image compression means poor quality images when viewed at full size
  • Read full review
Overall 4
3.6
Performance 2
2.0
Picture quality 6
6.0
Display 4
4.0
Ergonomics 4
4.0

Desastre total

democri, quesabesde.com
15 October 2005
  • Summary: Hace ya tiempo ke la tengo y ya no se ke encontrarle ke sea bueno, las pilas se agotan antes de encenderla y claro si la camara ya tiene ese problema no te puedes fiar de ella para llevartela por ahi. Ahora estoy pensando en comprarme otra y darle la patada a esta kiza la sony t7. MI CONSEJO: NO OS LA COMPREIS, COMPRAR LA KODAK DX6340 = TIRAR EL DINERO.
  • Read full review Translate to English