www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Kodak DC210 plus
2.5 out of 10

Kodak DC210 plus

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Kodak DC210 plus

Showing 1-10 of 23
Overall 4
4.0

Garbage

Mike, Amazon
28 May 2004
  • Summary: I bought this camera when it first came out in 1998 for $700 + TAX!!!! This is what i got: Unnatural blurry pictures, 4 AA batteries run out after 10 shots, no options, slow shutter speed, zoom sucks, have to wait forever between pictures, uses old compact flash, slow transfer rate (serial port, 1...
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

dc-210 worth a look

rdavis@nyx.net, Amazon
14 September 2003
  • Summary: As digital cameras with better resolution appear, the Kodak DC-210 seems perhaps outdated. But it is not. For pictures to insert into web pages, it is perfect. The DC-210 has a large LCD for viewing photos, and a two to one optical zoom lens.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Excelent for perfect pictures

Jennifer Stenton "stenton999", Amazon
10 December 2002
  • Summary: If you are looking for speed this is not your camera. I love it! I am more into quality of pictures rather than the speed I can take them. This camera lets you view every picture right after you take it and immediatly decide if you want ot keep it.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

High Priced, Low Performance Dud of a Camera

C. McCloud, Amazon
1 November 2002
  • Summary: Initially the camera worked fine. Pictures were of good quality and all features worked fine. After only a few months the camera's performance has dropped considerably. Brand new batteries only last for about 12 pictures, the camera doesn't even power up at times even with new batteries.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Slow, Fragile, Slow

Daiku "CB", Amazon
20 June 2002
  • Summary: I guess I expected more from Kodak. This camera takes a long time to turn on, a long time between pictures, and a long time to transfer pictures. Picture quality was adequate. Wouldn't work in the cold, and stopped working all toghether shortly after the warranty ran out. Not recommended.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Recommended

R McEwan, Amazon
13 January 2002
  • Summary: This is a 1.3 Mpix camera and is an excellent camera for this category. It takes great pictures up to 4 X 6. I have even printed out 8 X 10 that are very good. Upon close scrutiny you would notice pixels at that resolution but that would be true for any camera of this calibre.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Not recommended

Amazon
24 June 2001
  • Summary: This is my second experience using a digital camera (the other was an Olympus). The software is a pain to install, and I tried installing it on at least thre different computers and got problems with all.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Not up to the mark . . . .

Amazon
26 December 1999
  • Summary: The camera is good but it has the following problems : 1. The camera does not shut off, we need to remove the batteries from the camera. 2. It gives continous problems right from the second month onwards. The battery shutter does not close properly. Sometime the zoom does not go in.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Don't worry about the battery life

Amazon
3 December 1999
  • Summary: This is a fantastic camera - I've had mine for over 12 months and have taken over 3000 pictures with it. Never a problem and seldom a bad shot. Don't listen to people grumbling about battery life.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

This camera is pretty darn good

Amazon
13 October 1999
  • Summary: I bought one of these camera's for my office about 2 years ago after reading reviews of various digital cameras in a computer magazine. It turned out to be a great buy. It is a very easy to use and takes pretty good photos. I liked it so much, that I ended up buying one for myself.
  • Read full review
Next page >>