www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

HP Photosmart M407
3.3 out of 10

HP Photosmart M407

A great choice for budding digital photographers, the HP Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with HP Photosmart M407

Showing 1-10 of 124
Overall 8
8.0

Nice First Digital Camera

Wave, pcRUSH.com
21 July 2006
  • Summary: Comments about Hewlett Packard Photosmart M407: This is a nice first time digital camera. It taks good portraits and non-moving shots. The memory appears to be to slow for action shots, and if there is not enough light, the flash does not make the photos bright enough to see.
  • Pros: Accurate Colors, Nice Features and Settings, Rugged, Simple Controls
  • Cons: Memory not fast enough, Not Good In Low Light
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

2.5 stars Easy to use but not very good picture quality

FirePepper Red "firepepper red", Amazon
7 September 2005
  • Summary: The Photosmart m407 is very easy to use and understand but the picture quality is definitely not as good as other models in this range. It can only be recommended for people who are new to digital cameras and ease of use is more important than picture quality.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Completely AWFUL

HilaryDuffSucks, Amazon
23 June 2005
  • Summary: For Christmas I asked for a digital camera. Since my family goes with the "you can open one before Christmas", I got this under the Christmas tree. I starting taking pictures, and I can't believe how poor the image quality is!
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

terrible

viewer from NJ, Amazon
23 June 2005
  • Summary: This camera is the worst. I was so dissappointed with it. Everytime I use it I get so fed up that I go back to using my regular camera. The delay is so bad that sometimes it takes me 25 pictures to get it right. The batteries go so fast and always need to be recharged.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

***I HATE HP!!!!***

S. Ali, Amazon
23 June 2005
  • Summary: THIS CAMERA IS THE WORST!!!I BOUGHT THIS ON BLACK FRIDAY THERE ARE MANY REASONS WHY I AM RETURNING THIS PIECE OF JUNK: 1.FIRST OF ALL, IT RUNS ON DOUBLE A BATTERIES 2.WHEN I CAME HOME I STARTED TAKING PICTURES.AFTER I TOOK MY FIRST PICTURE, IT SAID ERROR SAVING IMAGE!
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Bad outweighs the good

Paul J. Gifford, Amazon
23 June 2005
  • Summary: I don't like writing a lot, so I will keep this simple and to the point. To summarize: this is not a very good camera...at all. I first saw this camera at staples and being one of the cheapest cameras drawled me into purchasing.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

AVOID

T. Savage, Amazon
23 June 2005
  • Summary: I have owned this joke of a camera for over a year now, so as someone with alot of experience with it, I advise you NOT TO BUY ONE. I wouldn't reccomend this camera if it was only $19.95 and came with a free sledgehammer to take your anger out on it when you realize you just wasted twenty bucks...
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Nice camera. Delivery on time

John C. Null, Amazon
23 June 2005
Overall 10
10

Five Stars

Jenmill, Amazon
23 June 2005
  • Summary: Easy to use and reasonable price - this is just what I wanted.
  • Read full review
Overall 2
2.0

Worst Camera of all time!

L. Windham, Amazon
23 June 2005
  • Summary: I was so excited to be getting this as my first digital camera. After using it for less than a week, I became VERY disappointed. The pictures weren't clear, the flash was inconsistent, the batteries don't last, and it BROKE 3 times in one year.
  • Read full review
Next page >>