Summary: compré esta HP hace más o menos 4 años. En ese tiempo costaba la cuarta parte que la Nikon top de su tiempo (4 megapixeles). Todos los comentarios que indican hoy son ciertos, pero desde las exigencias de hoy.
Summary: This thing went after batteries with a vengence! I even went out and purchased those super-juiced 'digital' batteries and was able to take about 5 pictures before it finished off the brand-new batteries. It does take pictures (for the most part..
Cheap Piece Of Garbage--Not worth $1 never mind $100.
Danielle Greenhouse "Author of What They Left Behind", Amazon
4 May 2006
Summary: I HATE this camera with a passion. If you want to know what it was like to take a picture in 1906 instead of 2006, buy this camera. What it does do: 1. It takes pictures (sometimes...when it feels like it.) 2. It turns on and off (again, sometimes...when it feels like it.) 3.
Summary: Not only does this cammera suck a pair of AA's dead in 24 photos (or about 15 minutes of video screen) but the cheep plastic hinge breaks easy under the spring pressure. The photos are okay but not great.
Excerpt: Had the camera for over 3 years now and still working brilliantly. Being a bit old now, the design is a bit dated, and it is quite large compared to the more modern cameras available, but it was a high end model when first purchased.
Excerpt: The Hp Photosmart 318 is my second digital camera. My first was a no-name special that i purchased because i wanted a CCD webcam and not a CMOS one. When I bought this one I made sure I didn't repeat my first mistakes. PROS: Name Brand; Hp makes an excellent product and they produce quality drivers.
Excerpt: When I got it about a year ago the HP Photosmart 318 seemed to offer the best definition for the money. 2.3 megapixels for abour £180. It has an 8 mb internal memory which can store 7 images in top quality, 16 in medium and 116 in lowest.
Pros: ease of use, good spec
Cons: not that good in low light, heavy on batteries