Summary: Ok I bought this camera as my first digital camera.... Ive always been one for film... now at first I loved the quality of the pictures and the sceen is a great size.... my only problem is now im looking for something a little more pro..... its great and light weight... Is wonderful for snap shots and vacation....but im def. going to need to up grade to get a more pro look soon.
Pros: good size screen.... good micro (when you can get it to focus.), good on batterys. you can get some pretty nice pictures with it. has good settings for sun set. ect.
Cons: of corse its not pro.... sometimes the micro wont focus. its not always the best with lighting.
Summary: I have had this camera for more than 6 months and I keep trying to like it but it definately falls short of my expections. It is easy to use. I like the AA batteries. I use energizer re-chargeable and it's much more convenient than proprietary batteries such as HP. The movies are great with a silent zoom. I bought the camera for the 10x zoom and I really have been happy with the lens quality especially for the price.
Great LCD, Veiw-finder and ISO, auto focus defective.
Ronald M. Bowren "Ronbo", Amazon
11 May 2007
Summary: I have been a professional photographer for 40+ years, and over the past 6 years have stayed with the Canon line of Digital cameras. I had been looking for another compact camera to keep in the car, and could not resist the price of the new Fuji Finepix S700 at $214.00 (plus a free 2GB disk). All of the reviews had been great, so thought I would give one a try. Well, I received mine a few days ago, and what a disappointment.
The s700 lacks true image stabilazition, and does not match previous Fuji models on low light photos
Another Movie FAN "Steve B.", Amazon
2 May 2007
Summary: After downloading the full PDF manual (which you can find on the U.S. fuji site) and then auditioning this camera in person for about 2 hours while taking over a hundred test shots, I finally decided to pass on purchasing the Fuji s700, and went with a Kodak z612 instead. The two cameras offer very similar features at about the same price, but the Kodak z612 has a wider 12:1 zoom range (with really great optical performance) and it has TRUE image stabilization (which the...
Summary: bueno yo pienso que su uso es domestico tiene un buen desempeño no ka he probado a fondo aun pero si note algunas cositas como el tema de pixelado al convertir imagenes en formatos grandes ejemplos si pasaa una foto 15x21 a 300 pdi queda cuadriculado se notan las diferencias y un poco de ruido en los iso bajos que nos es muy agradable a este segmento pero comom ya dije es una camara domestica creo que cumple con su cometido.
Pros: Lo practico de los controles y programas y un buen disegnio y admite colocacion de filtros para efectos
Cons: no graba en formato RAW solo deja en JPG y A 72 dpi cuando se convierte a 300 dpi cuadricula un poco. y mete un poco de ruido aunque la trabaje en iso 100